Aug 2026· Journal of Smart Algorithms and Applications (JSAA)· 0 citations· 43 references
TL;DR
The analysis indicates that the promise of LLM-based agents for scalable automation, collaborative reasoning, and complex workflow execution comes with significant challenges in long-horizon reliability, evaluation standardization, communication security, cost-efficient orchestration, governance, and the interpretability of emergent multi-agent behavior.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred the development of agentic artificial intelligence systems that can reason autonomously, plan, use tools, integrate memory, and carry out multi-step tasks. Unlike conventional prompt-response systems, LLM-based agents extend generative models to goal-oriented architectures that can decompose complex objectives, interact with external environments, and coordinate actions in iterative workflows. The survey systematically reviews LLM-based agent frameworks, multi-agent collaboration architectures, internal communication mechanisms, emerging cross-system interoperability protocols, and open research challenges. The review uses a PRISMA-based methodology, including literature from 2020 to March 2026, with particular focus on prominent frameworks such as LangChain, AutoGPT, AutoGen, MetaGPT, CAMEL, ChatDev, and CrewAI. The survey discusses the transition from modular chain-oriented to stateful graph-oriented and autonomous execution models and presents a systematic taxonomy of multi-agent collaboration architectures, including hierarchical, peer-to-peer, and role-based models. It also reviews the main internal communication mechanisms used to facilitate coordination and information sharing between LLM-based agents and distinguishes them from emerging interoperability protocols designed to support interaction across heterogeneous agents, tools, services, and frameworks. The analysis indicates that the promise of LLM-based agents for scalable automation, collaborative reasoning, and complex workflow execution comes with significant challenges in long-horizon reliability, evaluation standardization, communication security, cost-efficient orchestration, governance, and the interpretability of emergent multi-agent behavior. The survey covers architectural evolution, collaboration patterns, communication mechanisms, framework-level characteristics, and open research challenges. This provides a structured foundation for future research on reliable and trustworthy agentic artificial intelligence systems.
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for complex tasks requiring autonomous planning, tool use, and inter-agent coordination. However, the non-deterministic nature of LLM outputs and the emergent behavior arising from agent interactions render traditional test oracles ineffective, creating a critical gap in quality assurance for agentic AI. This work introduces MORPHAGENT, a framework designed to address the oracle problem in multi-agent LLM systems through trace-based behavioral analysis. Our contributions are threefold: (1) goal-preservation relations that verify consistent goal achievement under input perturbations, (2) coordination-consistency relations that validate inter-agent delegation and communication patterns under agent substitution and reordering, and (3) tool-use integrity relations that ensure semantic equivalence of tool invocation sequences under prompt paraphrasing. MorphAgent instruments agent execution to capture structured traces comprising planning steps, tool calls, message exchanges, and final outputs, then systematically applies metamorphic transformations and checks behavioral invariants without requiring ground-truth oracles. We evaluate the framework on four multi-agent benchmarks spanning code generation, research synthesis, customer service, and data analysis tasks, encompassing 2,840 source-followup execution pairs across three LLM backends. Results show that MORPHAGENT detects 82.0% of seeded behavioral faults, including 90.3% of coordination failures and 81.7% of goal-deviation faults, while maintaining a false positive rate of 6.1%. The framework uncovers 14 previously unreported behavioral anomalies in established multi-agent frameworks, demonstrating its practical utility for assuring agentic AI reliability. These results suggest that trace-based metamorphic testing can serve as a practical foundation for reliable validation of emerging agentic AI systems.
Gopalakrishnan Marimuthu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A semantic-uncertainty-guided orchestration approach, HASSUM is introduced as a general framework for uncertainty-aware coordination in multi-agent systems and suggests that semantic uncertainty is a practical and general-purpose signal for improving robustness and trustworthiness in agentic AI systems.
John Knowlton, Aritra Guha, Risto Miikkulainen· 0 citations
A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.
Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al.· 0 citations
EASy is proposed, a trainable agentic framework that jointly optimizes task performance and computational efficiency through reinforcement learning and consistently achieves stronger performance-efficiency trade-offs than strong agentic baselines.
Junnan Liu, Linhao Luo, Thuy-Trang Vu et al.· 0 citations
The main conclusion is that practical Agentic IoT depends less on placing an entire agent at one tier than on partitioning perception, memory, reasoning, and action under explicit latency, privacy, reliability, and safety constraints.