Clinically Grounded Privacy Evaluation of Medical LMs
TL;DR
This work introduces a clinically grounded framework that evaluates leakage along a graded axis of adversarial access, ranging from publicly inferable demographics to leaked note fragments, and provides a practical, reusable framework for contextual privacy evaluation of medical LMs.
Abstract
Medical language models (LMs) can memorize and reproduce protected health information, but privacy evaluations often focus on recovery of training text rather than disclosure under realistic threat models. We introduce a clinically grounded framework that evaluates leakage along a graded axis of adversarial access, ranging from publicly inferable demographics to leaked note fragments. At each tier, we measure verbatim memorization of patient-specific text and semantic leakage of sensitive diagnoses. Applying the framework to an LM continually pretrained on 378k clinical notes, we find that routine encounter metadata (i.e., name, date of birth, visit date, provider name, and practice location) elicits high rates of verbatim memorization across a patient's timeline and sensitive-diagnosis recovery (AUROC 0.91 for abortion, 0.82 for HIV). At the same time, exact-match memorization can overstate disclosure: 36% of memorized tokens reflect templated documentation. Our work highlights the risks of training on longitudinal clinical data and provides a practical, reusable framework for contextual privacy evaluation of medical LMs.
