Aug 2026· Message Understanding Conference· pp. 502-507· 0 citations· 20 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
PLAI is presented, a web-based prototype that generates explanations from lecture slides, audio transcripts, and a structured student profile through a chat-based interface and suggests that profile-based multimodal prompts may mainly support motivational engagement rather than immediate test performance.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as on-demand conversational learning assistants, but they typically do not adapt explanations to a student’s background unless explicitly prompted. We present the Personalized Learning Assistant Interface (PLAI), a web-based prototype that generates explanations from lecture slides, audio transcripts, and a structured student profile through a chat-based interface. We evaluated PLAI in a controlled pilot study with 24 STEM students, comparing profile-based personalization with a baseline condition using the same slide and transcript context. Immediate learning was assessed with a five-item knowledge test, while subjective experience was measured using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) and open-ended feedback. We did not observe clear differences in knowledge-test outcomes, but participants in the personalized condition reported significantly higher UEQ Stimulation. These results suggest that profile-based multimodal prompts may mainly support motivational engagement rather than immediate test performance, while larger and longer-term studies are needed to assess learning effects.
The findings indicate a dissociation between performance quality and short-term recall in LLM-supported study, which aligns with cognitive-psychology evidence that elaboration improves comprehension while retrieval practice consolidates retention.
V. Tsiligkiris· International Journal of Edu...· 0 citations
Student feedback is a critical input for continuous improvement in higher education, yet traditional end-of-semester written surveys suffer from low response rates, superficial answers, satisficing, and limited actionability. Voice-based conversational AI agents can conduct structured interviews at scale, asking open-e...
Thilo Tamme, Lea Schilling, A. Hantel· 0 citations
It is argued that progress requires validating the interfaces between tutoring stages, not only improving individual components, and that progress requires validating the interfaces between tutoring stages, not only improving individual components.
Sayantan Adak, Rima Hazra, Koyel Mukherjee et al.· 0 citations
TutorCaseBench is introduced, a benchmark that grounds AI-tutor evaluation in qualitative case studies from pedagogy, educational psychology, and special education, and reveals a gap between intervention recognition and context-specific adaptation, especially for open-weight models.
Y. Park, Chanyoung Park, Tae Soo Kim et al.· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is increasingly integrated into higher education; however, many AI-based systems function primarily as reactive answer generators rather than adaptive instructional supports. This study develops and evaluates smart questioning, answering, and clarifying (SmartQAC), a pedagog...
Quoc-Viet Nguyen, Min-Te Sun, Wu-Yuin Hwang et al.· Data Technologies and Applic...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.