Skip to content

Diversity-Seeking Docking-Guided Molecular Design Discovers Broader Predicted Interaction Profiles across Protein Families

Oct 2026 · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 0 citations · 31 references

Abstract

Structure-based discovery pipelines commonly prioritize a scalar docking score, concentrating candidates into narrow chemotypes and contact patterns. We formulate docking-guided de novo molecular design as a diversity-seeking exploration problem and compare goal-directed, quality-diversity, Pareto-optimization, affinity-focused, novelty-based, and random search policies. Molecules are generated by fragment-based CReM edits and scored by rigid-receptor GNINA/Vina docking. We introduce a residue-level multi-interaction fingerprint encoding hydrophobic contacts and hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor interactions, together with the reachability ratio, an empirical diagnostic of goal-retrieval discriminability. Across seven targets from five protein families, with 500 docking evaluations per run, Curiosity-IMGEP discovers 15.0% more interaction profiles than random search (d = 1.01, pBonf < 10–6) and produces +12% more Bemis–Murcko scaffolds and +21% more binary residue-contact patterns. A newly added budget-matched NSGA-II baseline achieves the strongest predicted binding affinity in the benchmark (−11.03 vs Genetic algorithm’s −10.98 kcal/mol; d = −1.02 vs Random, pBonf < 10–8), tied within noise with the Genetic algorithm, and leads on Bemis–Murcko scaffold count (23 ± 12), but underperforms QD/goal-directed methods on interaction-profile counts (259 ± 46, −12% vs Random). Representation ablations compare continuous and binary fingerprints, charged-interaction channels, distance cutoffs, and inclusion of docking quality in the search vector. Target-specific ChEMBL neighborhood and pose-robustness analyses provide orthogonal computational triage. The results establish that diversity-aware search broadens the set of docking-predicted interaction hypotheses generated under a fixed budget; they do not experimentally establish distinct binding modes or biochemical activity. Code, configurations, and raw results are publicly available.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.