Method is introduced, which augments SOAP-style preconditioning with a scalar secant-energy correction adapted to Kronecker geometry and an adaptive basis update followed by variance-state downscaling, and is positioned as a scalable option for stiff, high-accuracy physics-informed training, rather than a uniform replacement for existing optimizers.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve local conditioning but require expensive optimizer state, while Kronecker-factored methods such as SOAP scale to larger networks but rely on periodic basis updates. We introduce \method, which augments SOAP-style preconditioning with a scalar secant-energy correction adapted to Kronecker geometry and an adaptive basis update followed by variance-state downscaling. We characterize the directional secant matching induced by the scalar correction and give a bound on variance-state mismatch across basis changes. Across eight PDE benchmarks, \method attains the lowest final residual on six, including Burgers and Boussinesq, while SOAP-family baselines perform better on Gray-Scott and Ginzburg-Landau. On Boussinesq, \method reaches a residual of $10^{-5}$ in 4.1 hours with 9.2 GB peak VRAM, while Adam does not reach this target within 14 hours. Three-seed $L^2$ and $H^1$ errors on four representative PDEs support the link between lower residuals and improved solution accuracy. These results position \method as a scalable option for stiff, high-accuracy physics-informed training, rather than a uniform replacement for existing optimizers.
DeepOHeat-v2 is proposed, which trains on a discretized physics loss that handles the discontinuities natively, and proposes a self-improving framework: a hotspot trust gate sends flagged placements to a reference solver, and the surrogate incrementally retrains on the refined solutions, keeping an update only when it...
Xinling Yu, Yi-Xing Li, Zi-Yue Liu et al.· 0 citations
Backpropagation (BP) dominates deep learning but imposes a massive memory tax. For example, training OPT-30B with Adam requires $\approx$ 600GB of GPU memory (assuming batch size 8 and sequence length 2048). Alternatively, zero-order optimization (ZOO) trains in inference-mode (requiring only $\approx$ 60GB for the sam...
Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré· 0 citations
An unbiased direct gradient estimator is derived and the adaptive minimum-variance phase (AMVP) estimator is introduced for neural-network variational optimization by improving the signal-to-noise ratio of weak gradients to enable reliable scientific calculations where training previously failed, while substantially re...
Yi-He Xue, Rui Wang, Bai-Geng Wang et al.· 0 citations
SoftServe, a family of QN methods designed to overcome non-convexity and enormous parameter sizes, is introduced, and derives positivedefinite curvature estimates from the variational objective of Berglund et al. (2025), even in the presence of negative curvature.
Joohwan Ko, Tetiana Parshakova, Diana Cai et al.· 0 citations
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) frequently fail on stiff or advection-dominated PDEs, and two recent accounts offer competing remedies: switching from FP32 to FP64 to repair an L-BFGS stopping artifact, or replacing the MLP with a state-space-model (SSM) backbone plus sub-sequence alignment to counter architec...
Jin-Yuan Zhang, Peng-Ji He, He-Long Hu et al.· 0 citations