PeakPatch is proposed, a lightweight post-hoc correction system that intercepts the CLIP text encoder at its compositional peak and recovers the lost negation signal without altering pretrained weights.
Abstract
Contrastive vision-language models such as CLIP map semantically opposite phrases (e.g.,"a dog"vs."not a dog") to nearly identical embeddings, rendering them insensitive to negation. We attribute this failure to a phenomenon we call Representational Collapse: by tracking compositional divergence and visual alignment across the CLIP text encoder, we show that middle layers build compositional syntax, but the final layers collapse this structure as visual alignment rises, producing a syntax-blind final representation. To recover the lost negation signal without altering pretrained weights, we propose PeakPatch, a lightweight post-hoc correction system that intercepts the encoder at its compositional peak. An Embedding Correction Network (ECN) uses cross-attention to extract a negation-specific signal from the peak layer, anchored to a stable baseline, and predicts a deviation vector that re-injects the lost syntax into the final-layer embedding space. A complementary Score Correction Network (SCN) predicts bounded scalar score offsets for discriminative tasks. Both modules are trained jointly end-to-end while all CLIP parameters remain frozen, adding only 5.2M parameters (3.5% of the backbone) and preserving the standard cosine similarity interface. On NegBench, PeakPatch achieves 74.3% on COCO MCQ (+35.1 over CLIP, +17.8 over the best encoder fine-tuning method) and 65.5% on VOC MCQ, while outperforming all fine-tuning baselines on fully out-of-distribution negation retrieval despite training only 3.5% of the parameters. The corrected embeddings also transfer to text-to-image generation (+18.4 negation score) and generalize across ViT-B/32, ViT-L/14, and SigLIP backbones. Project URL: https://stevencylu.github.io/PeakPatch/.
Despite-encoder vision-language models expose a similarity interface that enables zero-shot retrieval but fails compositional constraints, this work proposes factored inference, which separates evidence extraction from constraint execution, and introduces LCSE (Logic-Constrained Score Editing), a training-free method that executes constraints externally using concept scores from frozen encoders.
S. Alshehri, Zhan-Tao Yang, Han Zhang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Across OLMo-2, Llama-3.1, and Qwen-3, under both MEMIT and AlphaEdit and in batch and sequential regimes, Moir consistently extends preservation in the most vulnerable domains, suggesting that aligning the preservation distribution with the model's operative distribution is a key factor in non-destructive editing and that the model itself may be the most accessible source of that distribution for deployed systems.
Jea Kwon, Jiwon Kim, Dong-Kyum Kim et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Text-compatible JEPA objectives must preserve multiple plausible completions rather than compress them into a single latent point, showing that text-compatible JEPA objectives must preserve multiple plausible completions rather than compress them into a single latent point.
Vision-language retrieval with CLIP-style dual encoders achieves strong cross-modal performance, yet practical accuracy often hinges on localized semantic distinctions where top-ranked near misses differ from the true match by a single critical detail. Hard-sample mining can select confusable candidates but cannot construct corrected counterparts; synthetic augmentation can generate novel samples but, without conditioning on actual model failures, targets irrelevant dimensions of hardness. We observe that a top-ranked false positive is a counterfactual scaffold---sharing most of the query's semantics while differing in a localized failure-causing residual. Minimally correcting this residual yields a hard positive of the ground truth in the same modality; the corrected and unedited versions form a hard negative pair that straddles the decision boundary, producing complementary pull--push supervision. We introduce RePair, guided by three principles---Validity, Minimality, and Locality---which mines false positives bidirectionally, applies LLM-guided counterfactual editing, and trains with a local hard-pair contrastive objective. On Flickr30K and COCO30K, RePair outperforms controlled augmentation baselines with only 107K synthetic samples---26\%--75\% fewer than comparable methods---confirming failure-conditioned repair is more data-efficient than error-agnostic augmentation.
Siyi Liu, Xiao-Rong Zhu, En-Jun Du et al.· 0 citations
Compared to prior CLIP-enhancement methods, MLLMCLIP achieves state-of-the-art compositional accuracy while delivering consistent gains on standard zero-shot classification and image-text retrieval, showing that feature-level distillation strengthens both compositional and general vision-language representation capability.
Jongsuk Kim, Qiyu Wu, Zhuoyuan Mao et al.· 0 citations
Structured visual reasoning, such as image puzzles, demands fine-grained visual perception, an ability current Vision Language Models (VLMs) lack. VLMs built on CLIP-based ViT backbones trade fine-grained detail for high-level semantics, and we show this loss propagates downstream. To recover it, we fuse DINOv3 and CleanDIFT representations into a perception encoder (DiffusedDINO) and align it with RoBERTa-L, yielding a text-aligned model TDDN that preserves this perceptual advantage: with frozen backbones and only $\sim$590K alignment pairs, TDDN matches CLIP on image-text retrieval, surpassing it on three of four settings. It does so while more than tripling CLIP's dense-prediction accuracy (ADE20K 5.20 $\to$ 18.11 mIoU, COCO-Stuff 7.35 $\to$ 24.44), despite CLIP's massive training corpus. TDDN leads on segmentation benchmarks among general-purpose contrastive encoders, including SigLIP$\,$2. We further introduce Puzzle Perception, a segmentation and visual question answering dataset that probes fine-grained spatial understanding, on which TDDN doubles CLIP's segmentation accuracy (11.04 $\to$ 22.51 mIoU).
Harsha Patnala, Debopriyo Banerjee, A. Munot et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
