Skip to content

Do LVLMs Truly Understand Video Anomalies? Revealing Hallucination via Co-Occurrence Patterns

2025 · Neural Information Processing Systems · pp. 118157-118184 · 4 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper investigates LVLMs’ behavior in VAD from a visual-textual co-occurrence perspective, and proposes VAD-DPO, a direct preference optimization method supervised with counter-example pairs that enhances both anomaly detection and reasoning performance, particularly in scene-dependent scenarios.

Abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) pretrained on large-scale multimodal data have shown promising capabilities in Video Anomaly Detection (VAD). However, their ability to reason about abnormal events based on scene semantics remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate LVLMs’ behavior in VAD from a visual-textual co-occurrence perspective, focusing on whether their decisions are driven by statistical shortcuts between visual instances and textual phrases. By analyzing visual-textual co-occurrence in pretraining data and conducting experiments under different data settings, we reveal a hallucination phenomenon: LVLMs tend to rely on co-occurrence patterns between visual instances and textual phrases associated with either normality or abnormality , leading to incorrect predictions when these high-frequency objects appear in semantically mismatched contexts. To address this issue, we propose VAD-DPO, a direct preference optimization method supervised with counter-example pairs. By constructing visually similar but semantically contrasting video clips, VAD-DPO encourages the model to align its predictions with the semantics of scene rather than relying on co-occurrence patterns. Extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of VAD-DPO in enhancing both anomaly detection and reasoning performance, particularly in scene-dependent scenarios.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

UHP Detection: LVLMs have their Unique Hallucination Pattern in the Consistency Space

Large vision--language models (LVLMs) demonstrate strong multimodal reasoning capabilities but remain prone to hallucination, where model predictions are not grounded in visual evidence, so a fully black-box framework that models hallucination as a structured uncertainty pattern is proposed.

Amir Mohammad Ezzati, Kiyan Rezaee, Bardiya Kariminia et al. · 0 citations

RIVS: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Representation Intervention on Visual Grounding Shift

This work studies hallucination from the perspective of dynamic representation shift during generation and proposes an online projection-based intervention on intermediate hidden states to suppress the hallucination-related directions, mitigating hallucinations while preserving language quality.

Xuanyu Yin, Xiaoye Qu, WeiWei · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Look Clearly Before Answering: Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs via Saliency-Driven Perceptual Realignment

This work proposes Saliency-Driven Perceptual Realignment (SDPR), a training-free framework that mitigates the degradation of visual awareness throughout inference and is robust against hallucinations due to its holistic alignment of visual awareness across the entire generative trajectory.

Pengxu Chen, Yao Zhu, Guangming Zhu et al. · 0 citations
#computer vision Preprint Aug 2026

LookBack: Where and How to Score LVLM Responses via Visual Reference Usage

LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens, consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.

Beomsik Cho, Jin-Ha Kim, Dongseok Lee et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

VADER: Adaptive Debiasing for Hallucination Mitigation in Video Large Language Models

Video-Adaptive Debiasing via Evidence Reweighting (VADER), a training-free framework with two complementary modules that combines Contrastive decoding then down-weights predictions that remain confident after selective evidence erasure.

Dong Xing, Jiaxin Chen, Hang Yang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Domain-Specific Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models

Large language models generate fluent text that can contain unfaithful claims -- a phenomenon known as hallucination. We present a multi-signal detection pipeline combining fine-tuned DeBERTa-v3 classification, Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout uncertainty quantification, and temperature-scaled calibration for response-level hallucination detection. Evaluated on the HaluEval benchmark, our pipeline achieves F1=0.915 and AUROC=0.977 on general-domain tasks, with per-task F1 scores of 0.97 (QA), 0.96 (Summarization), and 0.82 (Dialogue). MC Dropout inference further improves accuracy to 93.2%. A context ablation study confirms the model performs genuine entailment reasoning rather than exploiting surface patterns, with summarization F1 dropping 24% when knowledge context is removed. Learning curve analysis reveals that 25% of training data captures 77% of full-data performance. Beyond detection, we apply Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to a Qwen2.5-0.5B generator, reducing its hallucination rate from 85.5% to 37.7% (55.9% relative reduction) as measured by our detector. Cross-domain evaluation on the SciFact biomedical benchmark shows that general-domain training transfers poorly (F1=0.52), motivating domain-specific fine-tuning. PubMedBERT fine-tuned on SciFact achieves F1=0.63 and AUROC=0.81, demonstrating that domain-matched pre-training is the strongest adaptation strategy. Code and models are available at https://github.com/varunteja99/hallucination-detection-nlp

Varun Teja Chundru, Debasmita Biswas · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.