Jul 2026· Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal· Vol 13, pp. 19-31· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is argued that teachers require prompting skills, critical evaluation of AI output, understanding of automated scoring systems, and pedagogical strategies to redesign assessments, and that these competences must be embedded in initial and in service teacher education.
Abstract
Language Assessment Literacy (LAL) has long been central to teachers’ professionalisation, yet the field has given relatively little attention to digitalisation. The rapid emergence of generative AI in language teaching and assessment now compels a reconceptualisation of teacher LAL to incorporate AI related knowledge, skills and ethical awareness. This paper maps key affordances—automated item generation, scalable scoring, and timely individualised feedback—alongside critical challenges including overreliance, academic integrity threats, bias, data protection and equity concerns. It argues that teachers require prompting skills, critical evaluation of AI output, understanding of automated scoring systems, and pedagogical strategies to redesign assessments, and that these competences must be embedded in initial and in service teacher education. Sustainable implementation demands coordinated action by policymakers, researchers, test developers, teacher educators and school leaders to provide localised frameworks, professional development, and time for practice. New conceptions of teacher LAL have to integrate a dynamic AI component, with AI literacy and related requirements representing a moving target and LAL levels being underdeveloped in many educational contexts.
This study explores how pre-service English teachers experience and perceive the use of Gen AI in language education contexts, and underscores the potential of Gen AI as a supportive tool in teacher education while reinforcing the necessity of human oversight and reflective practice.
Ramazan Yetkin, Zekiye Özer-Altınkaya· Kuramsal Eğitimbilim· 0 citations
The Responsible AI Literacy in Education (RAIL-Ed) framework is introduced, developed through a systematic review and qualitative framework analysis of 67 studies (2023-2025), grounded in critical, pragmatist, sociocultural, and human-centered traditions.
S. Hossain, S. Ahmadi, Le-Qi Li et al.· 0 citations
The findings demonstrate that teacher AI literacy is not a simple transfer of general AI competencies but a contextualized competency system shaped by language teaching objectives, principles of language learning, and teachers' professional knowledge, as college English teachers emphasized competencies closely related...
Miao Wang, Tianying Yun· English Language Teaching· 0 citations
A unique, on-the-ground perspective on the practical and ethical integration of GenAI in pre-tertiary EAL/D education is offered, providing actionable insights for educators to advance personalised learning through GenAI.
The paper proposes a set of guiding principles derived from the identified tensions, emphasising teacher-mediated interaction, developmental calibration of AI use, transparency, curriculum alignment, privacy protection and equity considerations, which provide a structured basis for integrating AI in ways that support l...
It is argued that the future development of foreign language teaching must move beyond mere technology adoption and should be teacher-centered, constructing systematic coping strategies through the enhancement of AI literacy, human–AI collaborative instructional design, curriculum and assessment reconstruction, ethical...
Run-Jie He· Education and Social Work· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.