Skip to content

DIAMM: A Distributed Inference Acceleration Framework for Multimodal Edge Applications

Nov 2026 · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · Vol 37, pp. 2587-2604 · 0 citations · 54 references

Abstract

Multimodal applications such as educational assistants and medical diagnosis demand high concurrency and low latency, and are increasingly served by edge inference enhanced with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). However, heterogeneous multimodal models and fragmented edge resources couple three problems that prior work treats separately, namely compute and queue overload, unstable cold-start latency, and unreliable retrieval. Optimizing any one in isolation shifts the bottleneck to the others. To address this, we propose DIAMM (Distributed Inference Acceleration for Multimodal edge applications), which couples scheduling, cold-start, and retrieval through shared runtime signals so they co-adapt instead of competing. First, a queue management and service deployment (QMSD) algorithm adaptively prioritizes tasks and allocates service replicas under constrained edge resources. Second, a multimodal warm-up method prefetches model weights in the background to mask migration overhead, reducing cold-start latency while lowering the storage footprint. Third, a fine-tuned Question–Knowledge Assessment (QKA) module filters task-irrelevant retrieval contexts to cut prompt contamination and downstream LLM cost. We implement DIAMM on a Kubernetes-orchestrated cluster spanning x86 hosts and NVIDIA Jetson devices, and evaluate it across five multimodal tasks. Compared with baselines, DIAMM reduces average task-completion latency by 16.5% (up to 35.7%), attains a task-completion rate of up to 97.0%, and lowers average storage by about 6.3× relative to full weight replication on the x86 cluster.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.