Objective: Pathological invasion influences patient prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); however, diagnosis is often associated with high interobserver variability because non-lepidic adenocarcinoma (NLA) and cancer-related fibrosis (CRF) are intricately mixed, and CRF contains both invasive and non-invasive components. In this study, to enable quantitative and reproducible diagnosis of areas showing high intratumoral heterogeneity, we proposed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis distinguishing between NLA and CRF. This approach could reduce interobserver variability in prognostic prediction and help examine the different biological meanings of NLA and CRF. Methods: To clarify the physiological structure of lung parenchyma, we used elastin staining specimens. CRF and NLA were separately annotated in the first cohort (n = 35) and used for supervised learning. The AI then analyzed whole non-lepidic areas in the second cohort (n = 188); we then examined the relationship between clinicopathological features and the AI analysis. Results: For the first cohort, the accuracy was 89.2% on average. For the second cohort, groups with high CRF ratios (>50%) in the AI analysis showed a statistical correlation with types B-C in Noguchi's classification (p < 0.001), grades 1-2 in the WHO grading system (p = 0.018), and a higher 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (85.7% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.006). In groups with a low CRF ratio (n = 111), a central distribution of CRF was associated with a lower DFS rate (41.2% vs. 74.5%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The AI engine for distinguishing between NLA and CRF enabled prognostic prediction of LUAD with reduced interobserver variability. It may also be useful for examining the biological significance of NLA and CRF.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.
Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al.· arXiv.org· 73 citations· ⚡4
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.
Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al.· Advances in Neural Informati...· 59 citations· ⚡8
An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al.· arXiv.org· 56 citations· ⚡6