Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Mobility-aware service migration and two-timescale task offloading for distributed edge computing in open RAN

Oct 2026 · Scientific Reports
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Abstract

This paper proposes a mobility-aware two-timescale orchestration framework for distributed edge computing in Open Radio Access Networks, where user mobility, handover events, service migration, task offloading, and radio–compute allocation are jointly considered. The framework exploits the functional separation between the Non-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller (Non-RT RIC) and Near-Real-Time RIC to coordinate decisions over different temporal scales. At the slower timescale, the Non-RT RIC analyzes historical traffic, regional load, and predicted mobility flows to generate service-placement guidance, resource envelopes, and migration-aware control parameters. At the faster timescale, a Near-RT RIC xApp performs handover-coupled task offloading, service migration, bandwidth allocation, and edge-computing assignment using instantaneous channel, queue, mobility, and resource states. A graph-contextual representation is further employed to capture neighboring-region congestion, available capacity, and mobility transitions, enabling scalable inter-region coordination. The resulting stochastic optimization formulation incorporates communication, computation, and migration delays together with resource, queue-stability, and service-continuity constraints. A hybrid actor–critic learning mechanism with centralized training and decentralized execution is adopted to obtain feasible mobility-aware orchestration policies for dynamic multi-service Open RAN edge environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.