Nov 2026· IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing· Vol 25, pp. 20761-20778· 0 citations· 58 references
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of data-intensive and delay-sensitive applications has accelerated the evolution from centralized cloud computing to mobile edge-cloud systems. However, the decentralized and heterogeneous characteristics introduce instability and complexity, making efficient scheduling increasingly challenging. A core problem lies in the joint optimization of request dispatching (RD) and service orchestration (SO), whose decoupled decisions often cause inconsistent objectives and inefficient resource utilization. Furthermore, reinforcement learning-based scheduling methods usually exhibit slow convergence due to sparse and delayed rewards. This paper presents Cur-CoEdge, a curiosity-driven collaborative scheduling framework that integrates hierarchical coordination with intrinsic motivation for adaptive edge-cloud optimization. Cur-CoEdge adopts a multi-timescale learning structure, where we use a multi-agent advantage actor-critic (MAA2C) for per-slot RD. We also apply a graph convolutional network-based A2C (GCN-A2C) for per-frame SO. A bidirectional decision interaction mechanism composed of upper-to-lower guidance, lower-to-upper refinement, and lower-for-upper catering enables consistent coordination across layers. To enhance convergence efficiency under sparse rewards, we develop a curiosity-driven collaborative exploration method, which fuses fixed distance metrics with an attention-based adaptive similarity weighting to model inter-dispatcher curiosity relationships. We theoretically analyze the convergence property of this exploration mechanism and formally prove it. Experiments on a real-world testbed using Alibaba Cluster and PPIO traces demonstrate that Cur-CoEdge achieves up to 40% higher throughput, 26% better time efficiency, and 71% faster convergence compared with existing baselines, showing its potential for large-scale distributed environments.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.