Skip to content

BACO: A Backoff-Based Coordinated Task Offloading Scheme for Infrastructure-Free MEC

Nov 2026 · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · Vol 25, pp. 20949-20964 · 0 citations · 46 references

Abstract

This paper studies task offloading in infrastructure-free mobile edge computing (MEC), where end devices must autonomously discover candidate servers and make offloading decisions under dynamic connectivity and time-varying computing resources. However, the lack of centralized coordination incurs high overhead to acquire complete and timely server status information in device-dense environments, while independent user decisions conflict over high-performing servers. To address these challenges, we propose BACO, a backoff-based coordinated offloading scheme with three innovative designs. First, the proposed BACO framework coordinates user requests and server responses via corresponding distributed backoff processes over the shared broadcast channel. Specifically, long-waiting tasks and resource-rich servers are prioritized in backoff timer assignment, while user decision conflicts are avoided. A candidate server table at each user supports further multi-user coordination by reusing revealed server status information. Second, a salient-driven mapping algorithm is proposed to allow contending users and candidate servers to independently set backoff timers, mitigating channel collisions caused by excessive server responses by super-linearly amplifying priority differences. Third, the BACO backoff process is theoretically analyzed in terms of optimal-server revelation probability, collision probability, and backoff timer overhead, which supports environment-adaptive optimization of key backoff-related parameters under time-varying MEC environments. Extensive simulations and testbed experiments demonstrate that BACO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, reducing multi-user average offloading latency by up to 52.77% while maintaining favorable scalability and robustness in dynamic environments.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.