Quantum mechanics is among the most successful physical theories, yet its formulation and empirical testing rely on classical structures. Following Lev Landau and Niels Bohr, this reliance is not merely pragmatic: quantum observables acquire empirical meaning only relative to classical reference frames, and, in practice, quantization starts from classical models. At the same time, the two domains display forms of mutual irreducibility: intrinsically quantum features (that is, spin and exchange statistics) have no counterpart in the phase-space ontology of classical point-particle mechanics, while classical trajectory chaos does not arise straightforwardly from unitary quantum evolution in closed systems. A hierarchy is commonly established between classical and quantum theories, namely, a claim of ontological and explanatory priority according to which quantum mechanics is fundamental and classical mechanics is only a limiting case. This claim is less secure than is often assumed; therefore, the traditional hierarchy deserves to be examined. In this paper, we argue that a quantum–classical framework provides an effective and structurally faithful representation of empirically accessible physical systems in regimes where quantum and classical degrees of freedom coexist within a single, consistent effective dynamical description. To give this point of view a firm theoretical basis, we discuss the quasi-Lie formal structure underlying quantum–classical hybrid dynamics, with applications ranging from gravity and condensed matter to open, driven systems in biology and complex media.
The physical content of a theory is not intrinsically tied to any single mathematical formalism. Both classical and quantum mechanics admit equivalent representations, notably in phase space and in Hilbert space, related by the Wigner-Weyl correspondence. While this correspondence has long been studied in mathematical physics, its foundational and operational implications are often left implicit. Here we give a systematic account of what changes, and what does not, when classical and quantum theories are expressed in each other's native language. This representational viewpoint separates artifacts (such as the appearance of non-positivity or negativity under certain maps) from robust structural distinctions that persist across representations, in particular noncommutativity and its $\hbar$-dependent $\star$-deformation of the classical algebra. We develop the comparison at the level of states, kinematics, and dynamics, and extend it to measurement by formulating both outcome statistics and state-update rules within the same framework.
S. Schlegel, Borivoje Daki'c, Flavio Del Santo· 0 citations
Reverse Physics is a methodology that breaks physical theories into separate mathematical and physical conditions to establish their logical relationships. To showcase the power of the methodology, we present several results for quantum mechanics and their related insights. The standard Hilbert-space formulation conflicts with basic physical requirements, while a minimal topological modification can solve these problems. The ensemble space, rather than the pure-state space, distinguishes classical from quantum systems. The Born rule is an additional assumption linking orthogonality, mutual exclusivity and information entropy. Under explicit background conditions, unitary evolution is equivalent to deterministic and reversible evolution. Nonselective projective measurements can be characterized as Lindblad equilibration processes, while unitary evolution can be characterized as a limit of infinitesimal projective processes. Classical mechanics is recovered as the high-entropy limit of quantum mechanics, and every quantum state, pure or mixed, is a dynamical, spectral and thermodynamic equilibrium. These results are self-contained, use the standard vector-space representation and can thus be used as common tools and constraints for teaching, interpretations, reconstructions and future theories.
G. Carcassi, Tobias Thrien, C. Aidala· 0 citations
From the fact that many people are dedicated to the quantization of gravity, it can be seen that people crave the integration of quantum theory and macroscopic theory. Let's first combine quantum mechanics with classical mechanics to gain insightful experiences. The citation introduces the Schrödinger-Tu equation, which has gravitational potential energy and can describe macroscopic objects. Several successful computational examples related to atoms and molecules using the combination of quantum and classical methods for use were listed. The wave mechanics representation method of classical mechanics laws has been derived. This indicates that quantum mechanics and classical mechanics can be compatible and coexist. There is still much evidence to suggest that the Schrödinger equation (SE) cannot exclude classical mechanical laws: The mass m in the SE can be large enough to bring the described object into the macroscopic range; Steady state SE is the Tψ+Vψ=Eψ, a combination of the wave function ψ and the expression T+V=E in classical mechanics; The potential energy function in the SE can originate from macroscopic force fields; F=ma and the SE can be converted to each other; Completed electron diffraction experiments that exhibit both wave and particle characteristics simultaneously. Important conceptual changes can drive the renewal of physics. The shift from quantum and classical incompatibility to compatibility is an important conceptual change that can lead to the birth of general wave mechanics.
Runsheng Tu· Brazilian Journal of Science· 0 citations
Initially proposed by Hugh Everett III as the “theory of the universal wave function,” the many worlds interpretation has since been developed and refined into one of the most influential ways of giving meaning to quantum mechanics. This volume explores the idea that if one adopts the many worlds interpretation, then one can avoid what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance,” the non-locality that is supposed to be a consequence of quantum entanglement according to other approaches. The essays in this volume articulate a clear and defensible formulation of the argument from locality for preferring the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics over its rivals and evaluate it. They question in what sense those in quantum foundations should care about locality, in particular, whether and how an interpretation of quantum mechanics must avoid action at a distance in order to maintain consistency with special relativity. Finally, these essays assess whether the many worlds theory needs a particular metaphysical or mathematical interpretation in order to achieve the aim of providing a local interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Textbook quantum superposition refers to the feature that certain linear combinations of Hilbert space rays, each representing a valid quantum state, are themselves valid states. This notion is not operational, and it relies on the underlying Hilbert space formalism. Recent proposals for experimental tests of indefinite causal order, as well as tests probing the non-classicality of gravity, pivot on superposition, thereby calling for a theory-independent, operational formalisation of the concept. Here, we define superposition within the framework of Generalised Probabilistic Theories, based on observed statistics in prepare-and-measure experiments. Using this, we formulate three superposition principles to investigate which structural features of quantum theory carry over to other theories. We study conditions under which these principles carry over from subsystems to their compositions; to this end, we show that the quantum tensor product emerges as the largest composition rule for quantum systems respecting all three principles. Furthermore, we show how non-classical features such as entanglement and preparational uncertainty can be viewed as special forms of superposition.
