The Born rule for computing probabilities of the outcomes of measurements is an indispensable ingredient of quantum mechanics. The standard textbook description of this rule gives the impression that it implies the unitarity of time evolution. This view relies on the argument that unless the dynamics is unitary, the probabilities of finding all possible outcomes of a measurement do not add up to 1, i.e., the total probability is not conserved. We show that this argument is flawed, and that the general expression for the Born rule ensures the conservation of total probabilities even when the dynamics of a quantum system is not unitary. This applies to the dynamics of ensembles of quantum systems in both pure and mixed states. We discuss the status of the local conservation of probabilities and the arguments against the plausibility of non-unitary time evolutions that are based on the identification of the Hamiltonian operator with the energy observable.
Quantum mechanics is widely recognised as being incomplete. It is not consistent with the second law of thermodynamics and does not provide a scientifically credible physical account of the measurement process, the means by which coherence is broken and classically observable states are recorded. This has led to many ad hoc assumptions being used to account for various properties of quantum systems, among which is the coherence time of quantum devices that determines their ability to perform computations. Here, we show that all these properties can be accommodated naturally and consistently in the context of mixing quantum systems which exhibit continuous spectra, as arises in the thermodynamic limit in quantum statistical mechanics and quantum gravity. In particular, for isolated systems we show that the time-reversal symmetry associated with unitary time evolution of the quantum state gives rise to time-symmetry breaking and a semi-group evolution which attains thermodynamic equilibrium at long times. Moreover, the emergence of this non-unitary time-asymmetry leads to microcanonical equilibrium states in which all quantum coherence is lost and is accompanied by the transformation of pure states into mixtures, leading in turn to an increase in entropy. Inclusion of a macroscopic measurement apparatus shows how the outcome of a measurement corresponds to the von Neumann projection postulate, arising with probabilities in conformance with the Born rule. The mathematical structure of the theory which applies to quantum systems with continuous spectra is closely analogous to the classical ergodic theory of dynamical systems and the conditions under which they attain equilibrium states.
We argue for the universality of quantum theory using a dynamical consistency argument, within a specific Hamiltonian setting. We analyse two different types of coupling between simple quantum harmonic oscillators. Each illustrates an aspect of the free and interacting quantum fields and shows the inadequacy of semiclassical models. In particular, we establish that requiring the canonical algebra to be preserved under joint unitary dynamics rules out specific hybrid classical-quantum models. We apply our reasoning to the gravitational field in the linear regime, coupled to the quantised electromagnetic field and, separately, to quantised matter. We conclude with a comparison to DeWitt's analysis of quantum measurement, in which the apparatus, if classical, must be at least stochastic to preserve the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. We also note that stochastic models are inconsistent with the strict version of conservation principles, even if they comply with a probabilistic (on average) conservation.
We challenge the common belief that if there is no absolute time parameter in physics, a quantum system described without reference to an external clock can be assumed to be in a stationary state of its Hamiltonian. We present a time-reparameterisation invariant quantum evolution law, which for a given initial condition predicts the same trajectory in state space as the Schr\"odinger equation, except that for nontrivial trajectories it does not predict the speed at which the trajectory is traversed. The solutions of this evolution law are all time-reparameterised solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation. We show how the predictions of the Schr\"odinger equation are recovered relative to an internal clock in this framework. In contrast to the Page-Wootters formalism or Dirac's quantisation of the Hamiltonian constraint, here the global sate is not stationary. We discuss the assumptions leading to the common conclusion that the state can be taken stationary and suggest that they need to be revisited.
Reverse Physics is a methodology that breaks physical theories into separate mathematical and physical conditions to establish their logical relationships. To showcase the power of the methodology, we present several results for quantum mechanics and their related insights. The standard Hilbert-space formulation conflicts with basic physical requirements, while a minimal topological modification can solve these problems. The ensemble space, rather than the pure-state space, distinguishes classical from quantum systems. The Born rule is an additional assumption linking orthogonality, mutual exclusivity and information entropy. Under explicit background conditions, unitary evolution is equivalent to deterministic and reversible evolution. Nonselective projective measurements can be characterized as Lindblad equilibration processes, while unitary evolution can be characterized as a limit of infinitesimal projective processes. Classical mechanics is recovered as the high-entropy limit of quantum mechanics, and every quantum state, pure or mixed, is a dynamical, spectral and thermodynamic equilibrium. These results are self-contained, use the standard vector-space representation and can thus be used as common tools and constraints for teaching, interpretations, reconstructions and future theories.
G. Carcassi, Tobias Thrien, C. Aidala· 0 citations
The physical foundation of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory is still an iffy mystery. Here it is presumed that a physically reasonable mathematical model needs only three basic features. The first one are the transition probabilities, which are so typical of quantum theory. The other two constitute a variation of the postulate that continuous reversible dynamical processes exist and act transitively on the underlying space. One class of mathematical models with these features arises from the atomic JBW factors, which include the atomic von Neumann factors and become identical with the Jordan matrix algebras, when the dimension is finite. A further model is known, on which the exceptional Lie group E6 acts transitively. Interestingly, E6 is sometimes considered a candidate for internal symmetries in particle physics, but many familiar features of quantum theory get lost in this case (particularly the general existence of post-measurement states). The paper concludes with some open issues, concerning this problem and the classification of the mathematical structures with the three features.
In a complete quantum theory, one would construct it based on what we can observe in a system and operationally define in our universe. This philosophy goes back to some of the original ideals of quantum theory defined by W. Heisenberg, N. Bohr, and others as part of the Copenhagen school of thought. We argue in this letter that that if one wishes to construct a complete quantum field theory, that it is most natural to construct it based on a nonlocal theory of observable principles. If this interpretation is valid, then the one-particle nonrelativistic limit that recovers quantum mechanics would as well be dynamically nonlocal. In this interpretation we derive the nonlocal Schr\"odinger equation. We will as well demonstrate that the canonical position--momentum commutator and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle emerge from translation covariance.
E. J. Thompson, J. Moffat· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
