Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Digital-Intelligence Literacy Scale for Medical Students: Measurement Dimensions and Structural Analysis
Oct 2026· International Medical Education· Vol 5, pp. 105· 0 citations· 30 references
TL;DR
The DIL-MS demonstrated high internal consistency and preliminary evidence of convergent validity within a model with moderate fit and may help characterize medical students’ self-reported learning needs and inform curriculum planning.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Medical education requires assessment of students’ capabilities across digital technologies, health data, and artificial intelligence (AI). Existing instruments address related constructs but differ in their measurement scope. This study aimed to develop and initially evaluate the Digital-Intelligence Literacy Scale for Medical Students (DIL-MS). Methods: Literature-informed content analysis guided conceptual framework development and generation of 47 candidate items. A cross-sectional online survey using purposive sampling yielded 373 usable responses from fifth-year clinical medicine and anesthesiology students at Southern Medical University, China. Principal component analysis with Promax rotation and item analysis guided item refinement. Confirmatory factor analysis assessed the proposed five-factor model. Internal consistency, composite reliability, and convergent validity were examined. Results: The final scale comprised 34 items across five dimensions: Information Management, Digital-Intelligent Technology Application, Human–AI Collaboration, Ethics and Safety, and Critical Thinking and Innovation. The five-factor model showed moderate fit (CFI = 0.874, TLI = 0.864, RMSEA = 0.082). Overall Cronbach’s α was 0.962 (95% CI: 0.956–0.967), with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.902 to 0.939. Composite reliability ranged from 0.904 to 0.939, and average variance extracted ranged from 0.580 to 0.698. Conclusions: The DIL-MS demonstrated high internal consistency and preliminary evidence of convergent validity within a model with moderate fit. It may help characterize medical students’ self-reported learning needs and inform curriculum planning. Independent validation and further evaluation of content coverage, discriminant validity, and relationships with demonstrated performance are needed.
Artificial intelligence literacy is increasingly important in nursing education, but it remains unclear how its dimensions relate to three constructs related to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU) and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (ATU). This st...
Ying-Ying Wang, Ying-Xin Zhao, Lian Li et al.· BMC Nursing· 0 citations
The GAA-LS provides a psychometrically supported instrument for assessing students’ assessment-specific capacity to use GenAI responsibly within assessment contexts and contributes to applied measurement, feedback design, and academic integrity policy in AI-supported higher education.
Jun-Tao Nie, Ze-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Mei Lu et al.· Frontiers in Education· 2 citations
Biostatistics literacy is essential for evidence-based medicine, yet no instrument specifically measures this competency in medical students. This study aimed to develop a measure of self-perceived biostatistics literacy and conduct an initial psychometric evaluation in samples comprising predominantly early-stag...
N. M. Konar, Aslı Suner, D. Özyürek et al.· BMC Medical Education· 0 citations
Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to assess knowledge of comprehensive health care in undergraduate Health Sciences programs. Methods: A methodological study with a qualitative-quantitative approach, conducted in three stages: construction of the instrument, content validation using an expert consensus t...
Cleiton Bueno da Silva, F. Lopes, Nathalie de Lourdes Souza Dewulf et al.· Revista Contexto & Saúde· 0 citations
A context-sensitive scale to assess international university students' perceptions of healthcare service quality in Türkiye provides a more precise diagnostic tool for universities and healthcare providers to identify areas of uncertainty and improve service delivery for diverse student populations.
Enes Kabul, Yalçın Karagöz· International Journal of Hea...· 0 citations