Skip to content
Open access

Experimentally Tuned Protein-RNA Rosetta Score Function using Bayesian Optimization

Jul 2026 · bioRxiv · 0 citations · 49 references
Biology Medicine

TL;DR

This work proposes an experimentally tuned protein-RNA score function that can be directly implemented into ROSETTA and establishes a framework to efficiently fine-tune ROSETTA score functions for any protein-class interaction using Bayesian Optimization.

Abstract

Protein-RNA complexes drive fundamental cellular processes such as transcription and translation. Despite the prevalence and importance of protein-RNA interactions, the field lacks reliable and accessible methods to quantify the energetic favorability of these interactions. We propose an experimentally tuned protein-RNA score function that can be directly implemented into ROSETTA. Fine-tuning these score functions for predictive tasks requires repeated evaluations on a set of protein-RNA complexes, which can be computationally expensive given the number of parameters to tune. We used Bayesian Optimization to efficiently improve the energetic agreement between ROSETTA and experimentation. We observe significant interactions for specific RNA subclasses, serving as further confirmation of the physical validity of the score function. Beyond protein-RNA interaction prediction, we establish a framework to efficiently fine-tune ROSETTA score functions for any protein-class interaction using Bayesian Optimization. TOC FIGURE

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A new dimension in protein-RNA interface prediction: Integrating protein language models and geometric deep learning.

These approaches improve generalisability, reduce reliance on deep evolutionary information, and enable proteome-scale prediction of RNA-binding residues, providing a route to map and interpret the molecular logic of protein-RNA interactions.

Rozeena Arif, Alfredo Castello · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify RNA–Protein Interactions

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential regulators of RNA metabolism and gene expression, influencing processes such as splicing, stability, localization, and translation. Despite their critical roles in health and disease, including cancer, identifying RNA–protein interactions remains challenging due to technical limitations and biases of existing methods. Here we review and compare experimental techniques—including in vitro affinity purification, in vivo crosslinking, and proximity labeling—and computational prediction tools for RBP identification. We assess their strengths, limitations, and applicability across biological contexts, emphasizing the benefits of integrating experimental and computational strategies. Our analysis provides practical guidelines for selecting appropriate methodologies tailored to different cell types and research goals. These insights aim to facilitate more accurate mapping of RNA–protein interactomes, thereby advancing understanding of RBP functions and supporting the development of novel therapeutic interventions targeting RNA–protein complexes.

Brigette Romero, Jadira Aurora Fuentes Bautista, Victoria Beringer et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Expanding the scope of protein language modeling to protein-protein interactions with MSA Pairformer.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) Pairformer is presented, a protein language model that builds on AlphaFold2/3's bidirectional refinement between sequence and pairwise residue representations to accurately model the evolution of protein-protein interactions, despite training exclusively on individual chains.

Yo Akiyama, Zhidian Zhang, Olivia Tang et al. · 3 citations
Open access Jul 2026

ProteinDock: A physics-informed layer to improve protein-protein docking reliability

It is demonstrated that a truncated version of ProteinDock can be used to choose the optimal prediction among outputs from multiple deep learning-based tools, and shown that this strategy is a computationally efficient alternative to increasing the seed quantity for deep-learning predictions.

G. Rajagopal, Søren C. Spina, Joe Bailey et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.