Skip to content
Open access

Benchmarking Core-Level X-ray Absorption with MRSF-TDDFT, RASPT2, and Stochastic GAS Using the XABOOM Set

Sep 2026 · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 0 citations · 125 references

Abstract

Rapid advances in X-ray free-electron laser facilities are producing X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) with unprecedented detail, creating a pressing need for theoretical methods that are both accurate and computationally efficient to interpret subtle spectral features. In this study, we benchmark two cost-effective electronic-structure approaches for an accurate description of XAS spectra: mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density-functional theory (MRSF-TDDFT) and single- and (extended) multistate restricted active-space perturbation theory (SS/(X)MS-RASPT2). We apply these methods to the near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) of small and medium-sized organic molecules from the XABOOM test set [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 1618–1637 (2021)]. We show that MRSF-TDDFT and SS/(X)MSRASPT2 yield average errors below 0.5 eV for the lowest bright transitions compared with available gas-phase experimental K-edge spectra and reproduce both excitation energies and relative intensities across the full preionization region with excellent agreement. Furthermore, we introduce the Stochastic Generalized Active Space (S-GAS) method as a high-level tool to simulate XAS spectra and apply it to a subset of the XABOOM data set. In addition to providing accurate spectra, the S-GAS method serves as a benchmark for assessing the performance of the more approximate electronic-structure approaches. Taken together, these methods offer a robust framework for simulating XAS spectra, allowing us to systematically analyze the influence of orbital relaxation, core-valence separation, basis-set size, configuration space restrictions, relativistic effects, and vibrational zero-point energy. These findings provide practical guidelines for achieving high accuracy at reduced computational cost and for enabling more reliable interpretation of experimental NEXAFS features.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.