Skip to content
Review

How large language models can be used for teamwork and communication in healthcare settings: A scoping review.

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Medical Informatics · Vol 220, pp. 106648 · 0 citations · 35 references
Medicine

TL;DR

LLMs hold substantial potential to enhance healthcare teamwork by supporting clinical decisions, streamlining administrative workflows, and improving patient communication, however, ethical, legal, and accountability concerns remain.

Abstract

Background

Generative artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), has rapidly advanced and shows promise in healthcare for supporting teams through their ability to understand and generate medical text. While human-AI collaboration has been explored, the integration of LLMs into healthcare teams remains under-researched.

Objective

This scoping review aims to examine how LLMs are currently used to support teamwork and communication in healthcare teams, including both solely professional teams and those involving patients.

Methods

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we registered our review with the Open Science Framework (July 30, 2025). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for articles from 2014 to 2024. After screening 3,865 unique titles and abstracts, 127 full texts were reviewed.

Results

Twenty studies were included, predominantly employing quantitative and simulation-based designs, with limited in situ evaluations. LLM use cases were categorized into decision support, communication, and administrative functions. Outcome measures primarily focused on accuracy and quality (15/20 studies), with fewer assessing safety (4/20), readability or empathy (5/20), workflow efficiency (3/20), and error modes (2/20). Across use cases, LLMs demonstrated potential to improve efficiency and communication, although performance and risks varied by task complexity and use context.

Conclusion

LLMs hold substantial potential to enhance healthcare teamwork by supporting clinical decisions, streamlining administrative workflows, and improving patient communication. However, ethical, legal, and accountability concerns remain. Current studies largely evaluate model performance without considering the dynamics of human team members. Future research should examine LLMs' impact on trust, collaboration, and decision-making within clinical teams, while implementation efforts must address contextual and interdisciplinary factors to ensure responsible integration.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Feb 2026

Methods of Evaluating Large Language Model–Based Health Care Applications Used by Nonprofessionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review

A scoping review that maps approaches for evaluation of LLM-based applications used for health purposes by nonprofessionals and will provide directional guidance for further research and development in the field of quality assurance for LLM-based applications used by nonprofessionals is outlined.

Maren Keuchel, Pinar Bisgin, Tom Strube et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Multilingual Conversational AI Chatbots for Efficient Healthcare Delivery During Case History-Taking: A Systematic Review

Multilingual AI chatbots demonstrate a boost in healthcare efficiency, a reduction in language barriers, and the promotion of health equity, but exhibit challenges regarding validation, workflow integration, and evaluation standards, along with ethical issues such as privacy and bias.

R. Sharanesha, Deepti Virupakshappa, A. Abushanan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Reliability of Human Evaluation of Large Language Models in Health Care Settings: Scoping Review

It is suggested that the reliability of health care LLM reliability is difficult to evaluate adequately using a single universal standard, and future evaluations of health care LLM reliability need to be guided by standardized evaluation frameworks that reflect domain-specific contexts.

Euijun Yang, S. Ko, Hyekyung Woo · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evidence, use cases, and implementation safeguards of large language models in primary care

A pragmatic adoption approach is emphasized to prioritize high-volume, lower-risk clerical and communication workflows; maintain clinician verification and accountability; and apply governance and equity safeguards before scale-up before scale-up.

Michael Christof, Krish Patel, Jian-Dong Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Large language model–based patient handoff tools relevant to intensive care: a scoping review

Current evidence suggests that LLMs have considerable potential to support future ICU handoff workflows but substantial evidence gaps remain and prospective evaluation in real-world ICU settings, with clinically meaningful safety metrics and structured communication frameworks, is needed.

S. Bains, Michael R Kolesnikov, S. Bedrick et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Do Large Language Models Support Nursing Care Planning? A Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Approaches and Outcomes.

The scoping review highlights that large language models can only serve as assistive tools in the development of nursing care plans, while nurses remain the primary decision-makers, and underscores the need to enhance nurses' AI literacy to strengthen human-AI collaboration.

Jian-Wen Zeng, Xu-Le Zhu, Shi-Ying Shen et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.