Active Inference for Interaction-Mediated Control of a High-Dimensional Robotic Arm
Fraser C. PatersonSebastian SteinMarkus KlarJohn H. WilliamsonRoderick Murray-Smith
Oct 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
We propose interaction-mediated control via Active Inference as a general architectural approach to high-dimensional control problems in Human--Computer Interaction (HCI). This architecture recasts user interaction as the provision of evidence about a latent task objective, rather than the direct specification of plant-control inputs. The mediating function is distributed between an interaction broker, which selects informative user queries and performs Bayesian inference over user preferences, and an Active Inference controller, which autonomously plans and acts under the resulting preference information to control the plant. This division of labour decouples the semantics of user interaction from those of low-level plant control. We instantiate the architecture in a simulated, multi-link robotic arm to perform a simultaneous whole-arm target-coverage task. A simulated user communicates exclusively through a clutch-style binary evaluative channel, without specifying joint-torque commands. Across increasing arm dimensionalities, the architecture achieves successful interaction-mediated control, although task success is lower than when the controller receives the true target preferences directly. Exact target-subset identification also remains imperfect, highlighting the distinction between preference inference and successful task completion. The experimental findings provide an initial computational demonstration of the proposed architecture under controlled, matched-model assumptions and motivate its further investigation in broader HCI applications.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.