Oct 2026· Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology· Vol 152· 0 citations· 43 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Timing of vaccination influenced immune response, with a stronger response after the 3rd dose compared to the initial series, and patients vaccinated within 24 months of alloHSCT had significantly lower anti-spike IgG levels than those vaccinated later.
Abstract
Recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) are at increased risk of COVID-19 and lower vaccine immunogenicity. This study assessed vaccine immunogenicity and safety in these patients. We analyzed the serological response after the 2nd and 3rd SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as well as potential factors influencing this response. Data were obtained from internal hospital records. In addition, a questionnaire was used to evaluate the vaccination status, vaccination side effects and the course of expired COVID-19 disease. In total, 114 patients (median age 62, range 27 – 70) were enrolled between July and September 2022, with 55 females (48.2%). One year later a follow up was conducted. Most patients (89.4%) were vaccinated at least twice, 66.7% received three vaccinations, and 10.5% refused the vaccination. The mRNA vaccines were predominantly used. Most patients responded and reached SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers after the 2nd (81.8%) or 3rd (96.1%) vaccination. Patients vaccinated within 24 months of alloHSCT had significantly lower anti-spike IgG levels than those vaccinated later (p=0.017). Common side effects included arm pain (34%), swelling (14%), and limb pain (17%). Vaccination was feasible and well-tolerated in alloHSCT recipients. Timing of vaccination influenced immune response, with a stronger response after the 3rd dose compared to the initial series.
Background: Immunocompromised patients are at heightened risk for severe COVID-19 and its complications. While vaccination is critical for this population, long-term adherence and the durability of vaccine-induced immunity remain significant public health concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal serologi...
A. Sarcone, Maria Rosaria Deodato, A. De Pasquale et al.· Vaccines· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunomodulatory therapy may respond less well to vaccination. We followed humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination over 12 months.
METHODS
In this single-centre, prospective cohort study, adults with IBD received mRNA vaccine under the Aust...
Wolfram Mayr, Astrid I. Knell, A. Boehm et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, developed using a novel technology distinct from conventional vaccines, were widely administered. Compared to classical vaccines, mRNA vaccines are known to induce more pronounced immune responses. This stu...
Turker Emre, F. Mete· Clinical Laboratory· 0 citations
Certain vaccines may enhance anticancer immune responses, particularly in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), whose efficacy depends on preexisting anticancer immunity. We compared overall survival (OS) in ICI-treated patients with solid tumors according to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination status, t...
R. Absalyamov, Ruthy Tal Jasper, Hilla Vardi Behar et al.· JCO Oncology Advances· 0 citations
To determine the impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination on risk of corneal transplant rejection. All corneal transplants performed in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ), between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were recorded, along with COVID-19 vaccination...
N. Allen, Rachael L. Niederer, Akilesh Gokul et al.· International ophtalmology· 0 citations