Smartphone-based markerless analysis agreed best with laboratory measurements for sagittal lower-limb kinematics and resultant GRF waveforms but showed larger discrepancies in multiplanar kinematics and limb-specific loading.
Abstract
(1) Background: Markerless motion capture may enable scalable biomechanical assessment outside laboratory environments, yet its applicability to tasks involving elevated foot contacts and rapid loading transitions remains insufficiently characterized. This feasibility study evaluated OpenCap, an open-source smartphone-based markerless system, for estimating lower-limb kinematics and ground reaction forces during stair ascent, stair descent, squat, sit-to-stand, and forward lunge. (2) Methods: One healthy adult completed three repetitions of each task while data were acquired simultaneously with three smartphones, an eight-camera Vicon system, and two force plates. OpenCap/OpenSim outputs were adapted for stair and lunge kinetics and compared with marker-based kinematics and force-plate measurements using root mean square error, Pearson correlation, and cosine similarity. (3) Results: Agreement was strongest for sagittal-plane lower-limb kinematics, particularly knee flexion-extension (RMSE: 1.4–10.5 deg; Pearson: 0.94–0.999). Larger discrepancies occurred for hip internal-external rotation, pelvis motion during sit-to-stand, and ankle flexion-extension. Resultant GRF waveforms showed high similarity to force-plate data (cosine similarity ≥ 0.988; RMSE: 0.069–0.167 BW). Stair descent produced the largest deviations and variability, particularly for single-limb forces. (4) Conclusions: In this feasibility study, smartphone-based markerless analysis agreed best with laboratory measurements for sagittal lower-limb kinematics and resultant GRF waveforms but showed larger discrepancies in multiplanar kinematics and limb-specific loading. The adapted pipeline is technically feasible for exploratory movement analysis, although larger, repeated-session studies are needed before clinical use.
Markerless (ML) motion capture is a practical alternative to marker-based (MB) systems, yet its ability to estimate joint kinetics during team sport-specific movements remains unclear. This study evaluated the agreement between ML and MB lower extremity joint moment estimates during change-of-direction (COD) tasks. Nin...
Janina Helwig, Jos Vanrenterghem, Daniel Koska et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Background: Lower limb injuries are a major concern in soccer due to sprinting, deceleration, cutting, change of direction, jumping, landing, and kicking demands. Laboratory based biomechanical assessment provides high accuracy, but it is often less practical for capturing real on field movement demands. Wearable inert...
Abriadi Muhara, Juhanis, Muslim et al.· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
Ground reaction force (GRF) is a fundamental biomechanical parameter with critical applications in gait analysis, abnormality detection, and control of assistive devices. Traditional GRF measurement tools, such as force plates and instrumented treadmills, are accurate but impractical for daily use due to their cost, si...
Clinical gait assessment in individuals with transtibial amputation is limited by the cost, technical demands, and space requirements of laboratory-based motion analysis. Although research-grade inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems provide a portable alternative, their hardware and software costs may restrict routin...
Jutima Rattanakoch, Weerawat Limroongreungrat, Gary Guerra et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the use of wearable sensors to estimate L5-S1 flexion moments during symmetric lifting tasks by integrating inertial motion capture (IMC), surface electromyography (sEMG), and the calibrated EMG-informed neuromusculoskeletal (CEINMS) framework. Eight participants performed stoop an...
Filippo Motta, M. I. Refai, A. Ranavolo et al.· Wearable Technologies· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.