Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

YOLOv11-GPC: A Lightweight Detection Model for Maize Diseases and Pests with Edge-Device Deployment on Jetson Orin Nano

Oct 2026 · Agronomy · 29 references
Smart Agriculture and AI

Abstract

Maize faces a wide variety of pests and diseases, and its growing environment is complex, which makes detecting these problems quite challenging. Existing object detection algorithms usually require a lot of computing power, but edge computing devices are limited in terms of processing resources and memory, making it hard to meet the real-time and efficient detection needs for maize pests and diseases. To tackle this, our study designed an edge computing detection system for maize pests and diseases based on an improved YOLOv11 model. First, we integrated PConv into the Bottleneck module to build the C3k2-PConv module, replacing the C3k2 module in YOLOv11’s neck network, which reduces model parameters and improves detection efficiency for maize pests and diseases. Next, we introduced the GhostConv module to replace standard convolutions in the backbone network, which lowers computational complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy. Additionally, we designed a C2PSLCA module based on linear self-attention to replace the C2PSA module in YOLOv11, enhancing the model’s ability to extract features of maize pests and diseases in complex environments. The principal role of C2PSLCA is feature representation rather than a large reduction in model complexity. The results show that the improved YOLOv11 model can detect maize pests and diseases efficiently and accurately, achieving a precision of 87.65%, recall of 81.19%, and mAP@0.5 of 87.08%, which are improvements over the YOLOv11n baseline of 0.78, 1.96, and 2.28 percentage points, respectively. The performance improvements reported in this study are relative to the YOLOv11n baseline only. Meanwhile, model weight, parameters, and FLOPs were reduced by 14.02%, 14.89%, and 19.40%, boosting detection efficiency and deployment feasibility. Finally, we deployed the improved YOLOv11-GPC model on the Jetson Orin Nano platform and used PySide6 to develop a system interface, providing technical support for maize health management and pest and disease control.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.