Skip to content
#edge computing Review Open access

Machine Learning and IOT-Driven Decision Support Systems in Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Tabular Telemetry and Predictive Modeling

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management
Smart Agriculture and AI

Abstract

Decision Support Systems (DSS) in precision agriculture have evolved from static rule-based engines into data-driven frameworks powered by Internet of Things (IoT) telemetry and supervised machine learning. While recent literature increasingly focuses on deep learning and volatile commodity forecasting, empirical farm-level deployments rely heavily on structured tabular telemetry—comprising soil macronutrients (N, P, K), moisture dynamics, potential of hydrogen (pH), and local microclimate variations. This systematic review synthesizes research published between 2018 and 2026, evaluating non-deep machine learning paradigms tailored for tabular agro-telemetry across 58 peer-reviewed studies. We analyze multi-tier system architectures spanning low-power field acquisition, edge preprocessing, and predictive inference engines. Comparative benchmarking indicates that tree-based ensembles (Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM) consistently outperform kernel methods and linear baselines, yielding classification accuracies between 94.2% and 99.4% for crop suitability and fertilizer recommendation while maintaining sub-millisecond inference latencies suitable for resource-constrained edge gateways. Support Vector Machines (SVM) with radial basis function (RBF) kernels offer competitive stability on small-sample regime topologies. Finally, we highlight critical deployment challenges, including sensor calibration drift, missing data imputation under intermittent connectivity, and edge compute trade-offs, outlining viable architectural directions for resilient agro-decision frameworks Keywords— Precision agriculture; Decision support systems; Agro-telemetry; Random Forest; XGBoost; Support vector machines; Edge computing.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.