Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Deliverable No D3.5 Production Planning & Reconfiguration v1

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Transformation in Industry

Abstract

Deliverable D3.5 Production Planning & Reconfiguration v1 provides an overall status update of two core components developed within the CIRCMAN5.0 project’s Work Package 3 (WP3). They are aligned with WP3’s purpose that is to deliver novel simulation and modelling software to improve process and product manufacturing. The first component corresponds to task T3.4 titled “ML-Assisted Production Planning”, is led by ICCS and is dedicated to the development of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms that support the production planning and resource allocation. The second component corresponds to subtask T3.4.1 titled “Embedded edge computing system for the automatic detection of multi-type defects”, is led by CERTH and is dedicated to the automatic detection of multi-type defects in silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules through the design and development of an on-line embedded Internet of Things (IoT) edge computing system. In this first version of D3.5, the challenges and opportunities associated with the transition towards Industry 5.0 (I5.0) are analysed. Based on the analysis, the adoption of I5.0 principles within Production Planning and Control (PPC) systems is investigated, with particular emphasis given on the incorporation of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques into the sub-processes constituting the PPC systems. Furthermore, D3.5, establishes the conceptual link between the two components to be developed under tasks T3.4 and T3.4.1 and the PPC sub-processes, as well as provides a detailed methodology for their development, evaluation, and validation. Lastly, D3.5 outlines planned future activities including the finalization of the ML automation scenarios followed by the development of the algorithms based on data from CIRCMAN5.0 pilot environments and presentation of the results.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.