Skip to content
#edge computing Conference

Difficulty-aware edge-cloud collaborative OCR for low-latency grid mobile image recognition

Ying-Dong Wang Jun Wang Rui Kang Yu-Qing Gao Xian-Min Wu Ming Ni Sheng-Yong Guo
Oct 2026 · Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Signal Image Processing · Vol 14370, pp. 143700Q - 143700Q-8 · 0 citations · 9 references
Engineering

Abstract

Mobile image recognition is becoming a basic capability for grid inspection, equipment testing, and field data acquisition. In practical substations and line-maintenance scenarios, workers often capture equipment test reports, nameplates, and digital-meter displays under non-ideal illumination, reflection, motion blur, and unstable wireless links. Direct cloud OCR provides high recognition accuracy but increases response time and may expose unnecessary image content, whereas edgeonly recognition is fast but unreliable for low-quality images. This paper proposes DA-ECCO, a difficulty-aware edgecloud collaborative OCR framework for low-latency grid mobile image recognition. The framework integrates terminalside image normalization, ROI extraction, lightweight OCR heads, utility-based scheduling, ROI-level cloud refinement, and structured business validation. A difficulty vector is computed from sharpness, illumination, skew, reflection, and ROI completeness. The scheduler selects local acceptance, encrypted ROI upload, or cloud/recapture fallback by minimizing a latency-error-risk-privacy-payload utility whose weights are selected on a validation split under business constraints. Experiments on 6,240 de-identified real grid field images and a 21-day on-terminal validation show that DA-ECCO achieves 94.1% report-field exact match, 98.5% meter-digit accuracy, and 238 ms median latency, while reducing upload payload by 93.4% compared with full-cloud OCR.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.