Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Design and Implementation of 8-Bit Low-Power ALU Using Power Gating on Artix-7 FPGA Board

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Low-power high-performance VLSI design

Abstract

Portable electronics, Internet of Things (IoT) technology and edge AI are all examples of the many technologies that have seen rapid growth in recent years, which have significantly boosted the need for energy-efficient digital circuits. The Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) consumes a lot of power because of the constant switching on and off and leakage currents. This paper presents the design and implementation of an 8-bit low-power ALU using the power gating technique to minimise static power loss and leakage power loss. The new architecture features sleep transistors that switch off the ALU when it isn't in use. This method reduces the leakage current while still maintaining functional precision in active operation. The ALU can execute eight arithmetic and logical operations, including add, subtract, AND, OR, XOR, NOT, increment, and decrement. The design is implemented in a Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA, designed with Verilog HDL and simulated with the Vivado Design Suite. Functional verification is performed via simulation, and synthesis and implementation are performed to evaluate power, resources and timing performance. The power-gated ALU has significantly lower static power consumption and similar operating frequency and hardware overhead when compared with a conventional ALU design. This design is an effective and scalable approach to power-consumption-critical VLSI applications, such as battery-powered embedded processors, IoT, wearable electronics, and power-efficient computing platforms.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.