Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence in Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review of Methods, Applications and Industrial Challenges

Oct 2026 · Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems · 0 citations
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has grown from a rapid-prototyping tool into a legitimate production technology, yet its broader industrial adoption continues to be constrained by process variability, stochastic defect formation, and the near-impossibility of mapping complex Process Structure Property (PSP) relationships through conventional experimental methods. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have emerged as the primary technical response to these constraints, offering data-driven pathways to optimize parameters, detect anomalies in real time, and reduce development lead times substantially. This review examines AI integration across the complete AM workflow: generative design and topology optimization in the pre-processing stage; surrogate modeling, Bayesian optimization, and reinforcement learning (RL) during the build stage; convolutional neural network (CNN)-based in-situ monitoring and sensor fusion for quality assurance; and AI-enhanced Digital Twins (DTs) for post-process certification. Representative quantitative outcomes from the literature are synthesized into comparative tables, and persistent barriers-particularly data scarcity, model interpretability, and the absence of industry-wide standardization-are critically analyzed. The review concludes that federated learning, edge deployed inference, and explainable AI (XAI) represent the most promising near-term research directions for achieving autonomous, self-correcting AM systems. This is a critical-synthesis review. Targeted searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using 'additive manufacturing', 'machine learning', 'artificial intelligence', 'digital twin', 'in-situ monitoring', and process-specific terms (e.g., 'laser powder bed fusion', 'directed energy deposition') identified publications from 2015-2026, with an emphasis on 2023-2026 work Relevance, methodological rigor, and current literature influenced source selection.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.