A clinical psychology competency framework and measure: the development and initial validation of the Clinical Subscale for the Competencies of Professional Psychology Rating (COPPR) Scales, the COPPR-Clinical
Aug 2026· Australian journal of psychology· Vol 78· 0 citations· 56 references
Medicine
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective Evaluation of professional competence is important at all levels of psychology training and practice; however, there is no tool for practitioners to adequately assess professional competencies at the level of area of practice endorsement in clinical psychology. Designed to be used with the Competencies of Professional Psychology Rating (COPPR) Scales, this paper outlines the development and validation of the COPPR-Clinical Subscale (COPPR-Clinical). Method Items for the COPPR-Clinical were developed in accordance with the Australian Psychology Accreditation Council’s (APAC) Accreditation Standards (2025), followed by iterative rounds of expert review. Participants included 177 professional psychologists with Australian registration, and the psychometric properties of the COPPR-Clinical were analysed. Results Confirmatory factor analysis showed a unidimensional structure of the COPPR-Clinical consistent with the theoretical foundation of APAC Accreditation Standards (2025). Additionally, internal consistency was strong, with evidence of convergent and divergent validity assessed through a structural equation model, and a strong, positive correlation was found between years of professional experience and scores on the COPPR-Clinical. Conclusions In conjunction with the COPPR Scales, the COPPR-Clinical offers the assessment of professional competencies for area of practice endorsement in clinical psychology. Together, they have utility to assess the acquisition and development of professional competencies during training, professional practice over the course of a psychologist’s career, and in research contexts.
The 35-item instrument provided initial evidence of content validity, internal structure, and reliability for assessing the perceived importance of CNE competencies, and require cross-validation in an independent sample.
Heui-Kyeong Kwon, J. Ahn, Kyung Hee Seo et al.· Journal of Educational Evalu...· 0 citations
Clinical supervision is foundational to the training of psychologists and protection of public welfare, yet concerns about its quality have persisted across decades of psychotherapy scholarship and practice. The American Psychological Association (2014, 2015) Guidelines for Clinical Supervision in Health Service Psycho...
C. Grus, Carol Falender, Rodney K. Goodyear et al.· Psychotherapy· 0 citations
An important consideration in clinical psychology is that of professional quality. Having appropriate standards is not enough; they must shape both the training of clinical psychologists and the work that they do. Therefore, all of the elements that contribute to the professional quality of clinical psychologists, that...
H. X. Vu· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INN...· 0 citations
The Modified Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale demonstrated promising validity and strong internal consistency for assessing clinical performance self-efficacy among nursing students in this sample and may facilitate the evaluation of curricular initiatives.
Beth Pierce, T. F. van de Mortel, Jeanne Allen· International Medical Educat...· 0 citations
The CompRU instrument is a promising tool for measuring nursing students’ research utilisation competence at graduation and demonstrates evidence of acceptable psychometric properties, although some items in the Knowledge section could benefit from future revisions.
A. Heikkilä, M. Stolt, M. Hupli et al.· Journal of Research in Nursi...· 0 citations