Q-Guide is built, a small agent that reads a question, works out what evidence it is still missing, and calls targeted tool(s) to recover it---reading text where text is needed, zooming in where detail is needed, or grounding a region where position matters.
Abstract
Multimodal LLMs can see a document, but they often can't read it reliably. Small text, tables, visual cues, and topological elements still trip them up under direct visual inference, even when the page is already sitting in the model's context. Most document-VQA systems treat perception as fixed: they encode the page once, ask the question, and answer from whatever the model happened to extract in that single fast pass. We think document VQA needs slower, more deliberate perception: rather than answering from one fixed encoding, the model should spend a bit of extra compute at inference time working out what to look at next, and only then answer. We build this into \textbf{Q-Guide}, a small agent that reads a question, works out what evidence it is still missing, and calls targeted tool(s) to recover it---reading text where text is needed, zooming in where detail is needed, or grounding a region where position matters. On DocVQA2026 and Manga109, Q-Guide outperforms both direct prompting and recent multi-agent document systems ($65.0\%$ vs.\ $40.0\%$ on DocVQA2026, $32.4\%$ vs.\ $24.4\%$ on Manga109), and the improvement holds across three Claude backbones (Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.5). We find that accuracy scales with the perception budget---most of the gain appears within two to three deliberate rounds---and that the gain comes from directing perception to the right place, not from complex control logic: adding planners, routers, or multiple collaborating agents does not help.
Thinking-Once is proposed, a training-free, single-visual-pass evidence-routing method that reconstructs question-conditioned attention at this window, preserves core entity tokens and compact background context, and routes this evidence to later layers without extra visual encoding.
Z. Mao, Xian-Jie Liu, Tian-Yu Meng et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
While LVLMs rapidly improve, long-video question answering still remains challenging: relevant evidence is sparse, and question-relevant context often fails to provide cues that discriminate the correct answer from plausible alternatives. Diagnostic analysis on a manually annotated subset of MMR-V shows that prior agentic systems substantially improve cue retrieval over direct VLM inference yet fail to achieve a corresponding gain in answer accuracy, indicating that the bottleneck lies in option-discriminative evidence rather than topical relevance alone. We propose PACE (Progressive Acquisition of Critical Evidence), a factor-guided framework for long-video evidence acquisition. PACE proceeds in two stages: it first indexes clip-level descriptions guided by question-derived factors without observing the candidate answers; it then uses the candidate answers to derive contrastive cues and queries the index for verification. On MMR-V with the open-source Qwen3-VL backbone, PACE achieves 42.6% accuracy, outperforming direct inference and prior agentic baselines including Deep Video Discovery (DVD). On the same diagnostic subset, PACE recovers 66.9% of the annotated cues, providing empirical evidence that its gains are associated with improved evidence recovery rather than stronger answer-side priors alone. Consistent gains over DVD on LVBench, Video-MME, EgoSchema, and LongVideoBench suggest that option-aware evidence acquisition transfers beyond MMR-V. Code is available at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/PACE.
Baixuan Xu, Yinyui Xu, Tianshi ZHENG et al.· 0 citations
Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering aims to answer questions about an image by integrating external knowledge with visual and textual information. Recent approaches often rely on in-context learning to prompt Large Language Models (LLMs) with multimodal context in a zero-shot or few-shot manner. However, we observe that directly concatenating heterogeneous visual descriptions and retrieved knowledge into long, unstructured prompts often degrades reasoning performance, due to both excessive irrelevant context and the lack of explicit relational structure. In this paper, we propose an LLM-based Structured Context Reasoning (SCoRe) framework that infers both explicit and implicit relationships for prediction. SCoRe consists of three stages: Context Acquisition, which generates diverse visual notes and retrieves explicit knowledge via an efficient two-stage multimodal retrieval strategy; Context Selection, which filters relevant visual, explicit, and implicit knowledge using LLM-guided selection; and Context Compression, which performs Relational Logic Distillation (RLD) to transform raw text into explicit entity-relation triplets. These relational triplets serve as a concise and structured prompt for final answer prediction. Extensive experiments on the OK-VQA and A-OKVQA benchmarks demonstrate that SCoRe consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Qiyou Liu, Yong Zhang, Jianjie Luo et al.· 0 citations
Long-video question answering (QA) forces multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to work within a tight frame budget, so the choice of frames largely decides whether a question can be answered at all. The standard recipe scores every frame against the question with a pretrained image–text matching (ITM) model and keeps the top scorers. A fundamental mismatch underlies this recipe: ITM models are trained on short, concrete visual descriptions, while QA questions are interrogative and often involve abstract terms. Scored against the question alone, the ITM yields a near-random signal whenever the question is not a direct image–text match, such as one asking for the temporal order of scenes. In our LongVideoBench diagnostic analysis, the score collapses even on benchmark-provided answer-relevant frames, with more than half falling into a near-zero region —not because the encoder is faulty, but because it behaves exactly as it was trained to. We argue that this format mismatch should be absorbed at the two ends of the pipeline while the encoder itself stays frozen. On the input side, a type-conditioned routed pipeline reformulates each question into a single ITM-aligned description by selectively applying grounding, decomposition, and constrained synthesis. The ITM therefore receives exactly one description per frame, preserving the per-frame matching cost of a standard single-query baseline. On the output side, because the score distribution remains polarized and answer frames are scattered in time, we replace top- $K$ selection with a parameter-free Rosin threshold followed by a temporal maximal-marginal-relevance (MMR) step that uses frame positions alone. Across three benchmarks (LongVideoBench, Video-MME, MLVU) and and four backbones (Qwen2-VL, Qwen2.5-VL, LLaVA-OneVision, LLaVA-Video), the resulting training-free pipeline, RECAST, consistently outperforms recent frame-selection baselines without modifying the ITM encoder.
S. Han, Thang Vu, Junyeong Kim· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This work introduces Visualized Task Semantics (VTS), a controlled intervention that moves the question into the image while keeping the source problem and answer fixed, and requires no OCR or region metadata at inference.
Yongxin Wang, Ruizhe Zhou, Yueling Tang et al.· 0 citations
Perception-RFT is introduced, a training framework that applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to multimodal document QA, bypassing intermediate reasoning tokens to directly align visual features with structured grounding outputs, and a reasoning variant under identical reward settings is constructed.
M. HarikrishnanP., G. Vignesh, Ganesh Parab et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
