Oral pan-KRAS degraders are supported as a differentiated therapeutic approach for KRAS-driven cancers, with potential advantages in monotherapy activity, durability, immune engagement, and tolerability relative to pan-RAS targeting.
Abstract
Alterations in KRAS are among the most common oncogenic drivers in solid tumors, including pancreatic, colorectal, and lung cancers, with G12D, G12V, and G12C representing the most frequent mutations. Unlike wild-type KRAS, which cycles between inactive and active states, mutant KRAS is constitutively active and drives uncontrolled proliferation and survival through downstream signaling. KRAS PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) degraders are designed to eliminate the oncogenic protein, thereby stopping this dysregulated signaling cascade at the source. Their iterative mechanism, in which one PROTAC molecule can degrade multiple target proteins, may offer advantages over inhibitors, particularly in tumors with KRAS amplification, a common feature of KRAS-driven cancers and a resistance mechanism to inhibitor therapy. KRAS degradation may also produce deeper, more sustained pathway suppression and a distinct resistance profile compared with inhibition. Both mutation-selective and pan-KRAS PROTAC degraders have been identified and will be described herein. Both classes of PROTAC degraders target the ON and OFF forms of KRAS while sparing the related isoforms, HRAS and NRAS. ARV-806 is a PROTAC KRAS G12D-selective degrader currently being evaluated in a Phase1/2 clinical study (NCT07023731). Preclinically, ARV-806 demonstrated sub-nanomolar potency for degrading KRAS G12D and >25-fold greater anti-proliferative potency compared to inhibitors and another clinical-stage degrader. In vivo, ARV-806 induced robust KRAS G12D degradation that was sustained for >7 days after a single IV dose and produced tumor regressions across multiple models. Orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degraders have also been identified that potently degrade common KRAS mutations like G12C/D/V, difficult-to-target variants such as G12R and Q61H, and amplified KRAS. In vitro, degradation led to potent antiproliferative activity and induction of apoptosis of KRAS-driven cells, with no observed impact on cells not driven by KRAS. In vivo, treatment with the PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader led to regressions in multiple tumor models bearing different KRAS mutations. Additionally, a sustained pharmacodynamic effect was observed with the PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader inducing prolonged suppression of KRAS protein levels and downstream signaling compared to an inhibitor. In a KRAS-mutant syngeneic model, pan-KRAS degradation combined with immune checkpoint inhibition produced more complete responses than a pan-RAS inhibitor combination, accompanied by increased cytotoxic T-cell and dendritic-cell infiltration, reduced myeloid populations, and enhanced immune checkpoint response gene signatures. Together, these findings support oral pan-KRAS degraders as a differentiated therapeutic approach for KRAS-driven cancers, with potential advantages in monotherapy activity, durability, immune engagement, and tolerability relative to pan-RAS targeting.
Kathryn D. Smith. Eliminating the oncogenic driver: Advancing targeted degradation of KRAS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of AACR Drug Discovery and Development (AACR D3) Conference; 2026 Jul 21-24; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(14_Suppl):Abstract nr IA05.
This review synthesizes current knowledge on KRAS resistance mechanisms and highlights emerging therapeutic strategies, including rational combination approaches, enhanced RAS pathway suppression, targeted protein degradation, and KRAS-directed immunotherapies.
Rawan Salih, F. Sirajudeen, Mohamed Rahmani· Journal of Advanced Research· 0 citations
This review systematically summarizes the molecular mechanisms driving KRAS G12C‑mutant lung cancer, clinical applications of targeted drugs, resistance and heterogeneity challenges, and progress in combination therapy, providing a reference for clinical decision-making and further research in this field.
Xizhi Zha· Theoretical and Natural Scie...· 0 citations
This work developed panKRAS degraders using a structure-guided strategy combining reversible KRAS binders with VHL-recruiting PROTACs and enables potent pan-allelic degradation, including ON-biased mutants, establishing KRAS degradation as a viable therapeutic modality and positioning ACBI4 as a pioneering panKRAS ON/OFF chemical probe.
A. Mantoulidis· Clinical Cancer Research· 0 citations
Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), a member of the small GTPase family, is the most frequently mutated RAS isoform in human cancers. It drives tumorigenesis and progression in various malignancies, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), and has long been considered an “undruggable” target. Recent advances in mutant-selective KRAS inhibition have reshaped this view, but therapeutic responses remain limited by adaptive resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and context-dependent signaling dependencies. This review focuses on how allele-specific biochemical properties, tissue context, and co-mutational backgrounds shape KRAS signaling output, tumor progression, therapeutic response, and resistance. We further discuss current diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, ranging from direct mutant-selective inhibitors to pathway-targeted combinations, degraders, immunotherapies, RNA-based approaches, and exosome-mediated delivery. Finally, we highlight key challenges including adaptive resistance, tumor heterogeneity, allele-specific druggability, and the need for biomarker-guided combination strategies. Together, this review provides a framework for understanding KRAS-mutant cancers as biologically diverse diseases and for guiding the development of more precise and durable therapeutic strategies.
PERTACs that degrade the KRAS oncoprotein are a promising modality for the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas, and resistance to PROTACs may differ from conventional KRAS inhibitors, suggesting potential strategies for overcoming such resistance.
S. Garcia Borrego, S. Misale· Cancer Research· 0 citations
The recent approval of covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors, sotorasib and adagrasib, has revealed that targeted KRAS blockade can remodel the TME toward an immunostimulatory state, providing a mechanistic rationale for combining KRAS-directed agents with immune checkpoint blockade, STING agonists, and neoantigen vaccines.
Vasudevan Ramachandran, H. L. Koyou, Siddarth Raajasekar et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.