Skip to content

Recommendations for the Development and Implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Clinical Care: Policy Statement.

Oct 2026 · Pediatrics · 0 citations · 45 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This policy outlines recommendations for the safe, equitable, and effective use of GenAI in pediatric settings and seeks to empower developers, researchers, and clinicians to responsibly build and harness this technology.

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into pediatric health care offers exciting opportunities alongside critical challenges. GenAI tools, like large language models (LLMs), show promise in several health care applications, including but not limited to clinical decision support, documentation, and medical education across a wide range of pediatric subspecialties. However, real-world validation remains limited, and concerns persist around accuracy, bias, reliability, sustainability, and durability. Studies indicate that LLMs, when applied to pediatrics, often underperform compared with adult medical specialties, raising questions about their readiness for use in the care of children and adolescents. Moreover, the risk of exacerbating health disparities among patients of various races, ethnicities, genders, languages, abilities, and socioeconomic statuses because of biased or nonrepresentative training data underscores the need for rigorous oversight and accountability. This policy outlines recommendations for the safe, equitable, and effective use of GenAI in pediatric settings. Developers should prioritize diverse pediatric data sets, proactively address bias, and implement strong data privacy and security safeguards. Health care institutions must establish rigorous validation protocols, ensure compliance with privacy regulations, and maintain clear human oversight. Relevant regulatory and oversight bodies should enforce pediatric-specific evaluations and require postmarket surveillance. Governance frameworks must support interdisciplinary collaboration, transparency, and education initiatives to equip pediatricians with GenAI literacy. Reasonable disclosure of GenAI involvement in patient care is essential to establish and strengthen trust. GenAI policies pertaining to the care of children and adolescents must remain adaptive to ensure ethical, equitable, and evidence-based implementation. Despite these numerous challenges, GenAI holds transformative potential to improve pediatric health outcomes, and this policy seeks to empower developers, researchers, and clinicians to responsibly build and harness this technology.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Recommended guidelines concerning artificial intelligence and health equity: a scoping review

By explicitly prioritizing health equity, transparency, inclusion, and education, there is potential to meaningfully regulate AI in healthcare to redress systemic inequities in care and advance health and well-being in populations throughout the world.

Caroline R. Efird, Claudia Park, Parth Mishra et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in mental health: A narrative review of applications, benefits, and ethical challenges

The review found that AI tools—for example, selfreferral chatbots that reduced waiting times and increased treatment uptake—provide expanded 24/7 access, improved clinical efficiency, and potential for individualised personalisation, while Predictive models showed promise for treatment selection and risk stratification...

Shizal Nawaz, Laiba Nawaz, Hasnain Ali et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: from knowledge assessment to clinical reasoning and professional competence

GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.

R. Xie, Bei-En Zhang, Li-Feng Xiao · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in pediatric diabetes: clinical benefits, developmental risks, and ethical challenges

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming both pediatric healthcare and everyday childhood experiences. Children with diabetes represent a unique population at the intersection of medical AI, including automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, clinical decision support tools, and predictive glucose monitorin...

Hadel Khalil, Jane L. Lynch, A. Sowan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

A primer on evaluation methods for large language models in healthcare

This article aims to provide a pragmatic basis for designing and executing rigorous evaluations of healthcare LLMs by describing underlying concepts and potential pitfalls, while emphasizing the importance of aligning evaluation methods with the research question.

S. E. McKinney, P. Vu, S. Justice et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.