DataGovBench is introduced, a benchmark derived from governmental open data designed to evaluate LLMs in practical scenarios that includes two tasks: Table QA that requires solving complex decomposable questions and producing textual answers or visualizations, and Table Insight that evaluates the ability of models to generate expert-level findings through exploratory data analysis.
Abstract
Current benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in data analysis often fail to reflect real-world settings. They typically focus on fact retrieval from small tables and overlook the challenges of large multi-tabular datasets, external knowledge integration, and exploratory insight discovery. We introduce DataGovBench, a benchmark derived from governmental open data designed to evaluate LLMs in practical scenarios. The benchmark includes two tasks: Table QA that requires solving complex decomposable questions and producing textual answers or visualizations, and Table Insight that evaluates the ability of models to generate expert-level findings through exploratory data analysis. Comprehensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs, both with and without agentic frameworks, reveal significant performance gaps across both tasks. These results suggest that current LLM-based systems remain far from satisfying the demands of real-world data analytics. DataGovBench provides a challenging benchmark for advancing research on LLMs capable of both answering analytical queries and discovering insights from data. Code and sample data are available at https://github.com/SoHasegawa/datagovbench.
Experimental results demonstrate that D2VBench exhibits high reliability and robustness, effectively reflecting the LLMs'alignment across different value categories and dimensions, and providing a more realistic and fine-grained tool for research on value alignment.
This paper proposes a taxonomy to systematically measure both shallow table understanding abilities and deep table reasoning abilities, and designs an evaluation framework to robustly measure table reasoning capabilities with three distinct inference modes.
Ce Li, Xiaofan Liu, Zhiyan Song et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 3 citations
The LLM4DS-Benchmark is introduced and a multidimensional empirical evaluation of seven large language models is conducted, highlighting the need for multidimensional, task-aware benchmarking and suggesting that model selection for data science coding should be guided by task characteristics and practical constraints r...
Santhosh Anitha Boominathan, Sai Sanjna Chintakunta, Everton Guimarães et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 0 citations
A large-scale benchmark with 60\sim 90× more queries than prior work, built on 3× more databases, an automated pipeline that can execute existing methods without manual intervention, and multi-dimensional, fine-grained evaluation metrics for comprehensive assessment.
Bo Li, Chenzhan Wang, Long-Kang Lin et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Under cross-benchmark transfer evaluation across twelve models completed by all four readouts, difference-in-means attains the highest model-level mean on ten models, while logistic regression wins the most capability-model cells.
Yan-Shi Li, Xue Bai, Shu-Man Liu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
High-quality biological databases are the bedrock of data-driven scientific discovery. However, the construction of these resources remains a labor-intensive bottleneck, particularly for emerging research frontiers where structured data is non-existent. While LLM-based agents have catalyzed progress in downstream scien...
Jiaxian Yan, Xi Fang, Jintao Zhu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.