Skip to content
Review Open access

Feasibility of AI-Denoised Ultra-Low-Dose CT for Detection of Acute Pelvic and Hip Fractures: A Pilot Multi-Reader Study

Sep 2026 · Diagnostics · Vol 16, pp. 2862 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

TL;DR

DLD-enhanced ULD-CT showed diagnostic accuracy and sufficiency similar to full-dose CT for pelvic and hip fracture detection, though full-dose CT was rated higher in perceived image quality and diagnostic confidence and outperformed denoised low-dose CT numerically in hard cases.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of simulated ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT) enhanced with deep learning denoising (DLD) for detecting pelvic and hip fractures. Method: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study was performed at a multisite, single academic institution between October 2020 and May 2021, including 30 full-dose CT (CTfull) exams of acute pelvic and hip trauma (10 normal, 10 “easy,” 10 “hard” cases by fracture conspicuity). Simulated low-dose CT images at 10% (CT10sim) and 5% (CT5sim) radiation dose were generated using a noise model-based algorithm and reconstructed from full-dose CT datasets. A commercial deep learning denoising algorithm enhanced these images, resulting in denoised low-dose CTs (CT10dld and CT5dld) for evaluation. The 90 resulting CT cases were reviewed independently for diagnostic accuracy, confidence, sufficiency, and imaging quality. Result: Diagnostic accuracy was similar across CT modalities overall (CTfull 80.8% [72.9, 86.9]; CT10dld 78.3% [70.1, 84.8]; CT5dld 77.5% [69.2, 84.1]) and within the easy and normal strata; in hard cases, accuracy was numerically lower for CT10dld (45.0%) and CT5dld (42.5%) than for CTfull (57.5%). Diagnostic sufficiency was similarly high across modalities (CTfull 91.7%, CT10dld 87.5%, CT5dld 88.3%). CT full was rated highest in perceived image quality across all strata (mean 4.21 ± 0.83 overall vs. 3.47 ± 0.97 for CT10dld and 3.23 ± 0.98 for CT5dld) and in diagnostic confidence (mean 4.61 ± 0.63 vs. 4.45 ± 0.71 and 4.41 ± 0.72, respectively), though neither translated into a corresponding drop in diagnostic accuracy overall. Inter-reader agreement was highest between MSK radiologists, reaching substantial agreement on CT10dld (κ = 0.760) and CT5dld (κ = 0.672). Conclusions: DLD-enhanced ULD-CT showed diagnostic accuracy and sufficiency similar to full-dose CT for pelvic and hip fracture detection, at a fraction of the radiation dose, though full-dose CT was rated higher in perceived image quality and diagnostic confidence and outperformed denoised low-dose CT numerically in hard cases. Full-dose CT remains the preferred modality for complex and high-energy trauma, while denoised low-dose CT modalities represent a promising option for straightforward presentations where radiation minimization is a priority.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Accuracy of Low-Dose and Ultra-Low-Dose CT for Nephrolithiasis in Obesity: A Multicenter Review.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose (LD) and ultra-low-dose (ULD) computed tomography (CT) scan for stone identification in obese patients compared to conventional-dose CT. METHODS A review of patients undergoing CT scans for kidney or ureteral stones at two academic institutions was conducted....

Gabriel E. Martin, Kymora B. Scotland, Jason C. Smith et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Ultra-High-Resolution CT Venography for Improved Visualization of Cerebral Venous Drainage.

Deep-learning-based reconstruction significantly enhances image quality and venous visualization in ultra-high-resolution CT venography compared with conventional iterative reconstruction, enabling detailed depiction of small venous structures.

Sebastian Steinmetz, Anna-Luisa Grebe, M. Kondova et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Deep Learning Super-Resolution CT Versus Ultra-High-Resolution CT: A Direct Comparison in Cadaveric Human Lungs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Deep learning-based high-resolution computed tomography (CT) of the lung parenchyma has not been directly compared with ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT). We compared image quality between deep learning-based super-resolution CT and UHR-CT using identical cadaveric human lungs. MATERIALS AND...

Midori Ueno, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akinori Hata et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Low-dose vs standard-dose photon-counting CT for myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease: a prospective feasibility study.

LD PCCT serves as a radiation-sparing alternative for quantitative disease assessment, with total disease burden showing good agreement with the SD protocol, offering a radiation-sparing alternative without compromising CT-physiology correlation.

Zhen-Chen Zhu, Ke-Pei Xu, Yi-Yun Pang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

CT protocol optimization for oncologic surveillance imaging: phantom-based comparison of multi-scan and single-scan acquisition strategies

Optimize CT acquisition protocols reduced radiation dose while preserving the evaluated objective image quality metrics in the cranial, thoracic, and upper abdominal regions, and was identified as a candidate protocol for subsequent clinical and reader performance validation.

D. Kostova-Lefterova, F. Simeonov, D. Hitova-Topkarova et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Substantial Radiation Dose Reduction in Ultra-High-Resolution Temporal Bone CT: a Body Donor Study.

PURPOSE Deep learning reconstruction may enable substantial radiation dose reduction in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) temporal bone CT, but its performance across clinically relevant dose levels remains insufficiently defined. This study evaluated vendor-specific deep learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with hybrid it...

Lavinia A. Brockstedt, Sebastian Altmann, Suam Kim et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.