Jun 2026· Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration· Vol 32, pp. 111-140· 0 citations· 38 references
TL;DR
Examination of employees’ attitudes toward key dimensions of transparency and accountability in algorithmic decision-making reveals a clear acceptance of fundamental ethical norms such as human oversight and transparency, contrasted with less decisive attitudes toward more advanced organizational practices including systematic ethical training and audit procedures.
Abstract
The article examines organizational readiness for responsible artificial intelligence by analysing employees’ attitudes toward key dimensions of transparency and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. The study was designed to explore how workers perceive human responsibility for AI-generated outcomes, the need for disclosing the use of algorithms in organizational processes, the role of ethical training, and the importance of algorithmic audit mechanisms. A quantitative survey conducted in 2025 on a sample of 325 respondents was complemented with a multiple correspondence analysis, which made it possible to identify underlying structures in the distribution of responses and to capture differences in the intensity and certainty of opinions. The findings reveal a clear acceptance of fundamental ethical norms such as human oversight and transparency, contrasted with less decisive attitudes toward more advanced organizational practices including systematic ethical training and audit procedures. These results indicate that while employees support foundational principles of responsible AI, organizations still face challenges in implementing procedural and technical mechanisms that ensure full accountability. The study offers practical insights for managers and policymakers by identifying areas where competence-building, communication and institutional frameworks require strengthening. Its originality lies in combining attitudinal data with MCA to provide a nuanced picture of how transparency and accountability are understood by employees in everyday organizational contexts, contributing to the broader debate on ethical and trustworthy AI deployment.
It is indicated that effectively implementing AI in management requires parallel development of employee competencies, building trust in technology and implementing ethical and supervisory standards, in which technology plays a supporting role rather than replacing the human factor.
Małgorzata Oleś-Filiks· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The study concludes that AI should be treated as a governance support tool rather than a complete solution to municipal failure, because its value depends on phased implementation, data modernisation, capacity building, legal safeguards, human oversight and inclusive citizen engagement.
S. Nokele, Khathutshelo Matshela· Journal of Cultural Analysis...· 0 citations
Examination of expert attitudes toward AI finds a stable normative position of “trust but verify” emerges across professional contexts and proposes the framework of “exploratory qualitative research with quantitative validation” as a practical alternative to strict mixed-methods designs in limited-sample research situa...
The study demonstrates how professionals need to continue their development and follow ethical standards to handle AI system integration in a responsible manner and the financial sector requires organizations to handle their AI system implementation process with responsible management practices which will protect fairn...
Christine Bartolome· Proceedings of the 1st Inter...· 0 citations
A normative analysis of thirteen recent studies on the challenges of technology implementation, ethical trust, and legal regulation suggests that the current governance dilemma stems not only from technological limitations but also from institutional neglect, which enables accountability avoidance.
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.