Jul 2026· 2026 IEEE 9th International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (BDAI)· pp. 150-155· 0 citations· 11 references
Abstract
The operations of life insurance are among the most document-heavy and heavily regulated financial services. Such conditions have motivated growing interest in generative AI for document automation. The probabilistic nature of large language models brings unacceptable risks into regulated workflows. Hallucinations, omitted mandatory disclosures, and non-compliant phrasing could expose insurers to regulatory scrutiny, legal liability, and consumer harm. The paper presents a compliance-aware reference architecture that reconfigures the design problem by decoupling probabilistic generation and deterministic compliance enforcement. The architecture employs retrieval-augmented grounding over a continuously versioned corpus of authoritative sources, along with automated validators that check for the completeness of disclosures, traceability of evidence, detection of prohibited phrases and a human-in-the-loop review gate which captures audit trails for regulatory scrutiny. Our architecture is evaluated against four widely used LLMs: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3.170 Billion, Amazon Nova Pro, and Pixtral Large. For this, we create 50 test cases, which span five document types, yielding 200 baseline and 200 compliance-aware drafts. After excluding 3 failed generations from Pixtral Large, a total of 197 baseline-compliance matched comparisons were used in the final analysis. The compliance-aware pipeline reduces unsupported claims by $\mathbf{8 0} \boldsymbol{\%}$, from $\mathbf{2 6. 5 \%}$ in prompt-only outputs to 5.3%. After human review, all models achieve 100% final approval, with pre-review ready-to-send rates ranging from 78% to 90.7% across models. Results provide statistically significant evidence that the model-agnostic architecture substantially reduces unsupported claims while remaining operationally feasible, providing insurers with a promising proof-of-concept architecture for deploying generative AI in regulated document workflows, motivating further validation at production scale.
CTRAG is presented, a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline designed for automated compliance checking that employs advanced strategies, including adaptive chunking, dynamic retrieval configurations, and in-context learning, to improve the precision and relevance of compliance assessments.
Muhammad Roman, Karen Rafferty, Barry Devereux· 0 citations
CompVault, an Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ERAG)-based Artificial Intelligence Compliance Monitoring and Report Generation System for intelligent regulatory compliance assessment, and results indicate that the ERAG-based framework can be used as an efficient, scalable, and explainable solution for regulatory compliance monitoring and automated report generation.
S. N., Sathyapriya P., Vishnu Priya R. M. et al.· Journal of Information Techn...· 0 citations
A hybrid framework that takes a BPMN process model and a security requirements document as input and automatically generates security annotations adhering to the SecBPMN2 specification is presented, providing a scalable foundation for security-by-design BPM.
An agentic document verification framework that moves beyond passive retrieval to active, rule-aware compliance checking and incorporates a Propose-Decide-Evidence governance model is presented, retaining the human engineer as final decision-maker while establishing an efficient, auditable, continuously improving compliance workflow.
Ka Tai Lau, Man Chit, Jovian Cheung et al.· AHFE International· 0 citations
WuYu-EnvLE-Bench is introduced, a benchmark built from real enforcement cases, regulatory standards, and expert review that highlights the need for evidence-grounded, rule-aware, and task-adaptive enforcement reasoning.
Zi-Liang Yang, Yi Zhang, K. Lin et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
— While Generative AI (GenAI) is set to make a mark in financial services, the use of this technology in banking risk and compliance throws up the critical questions of interpretability, auditability and trustworthiness in the highly regulated sector. Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and Gemini Pro are not specialized for banking and do not comply with regulatory rules and standards. It proposes a novel GenAI based banking risk and compliance framework, namely a purpose-built GRACE (Generative Risk and Compliance Evaluation Framework), which integrates Explainable AI (XAI), a cryptographically secured Immutable Audit Trail, a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) oversight layer and dedicated compliance alignment layers for Basel III, IFRS 9, AML/CFT and GDPR. Beyond the architecture, we suggest a method for evaluating GRACE and representative comparator systems (GPT-4, Gemini Pro, and BloombergGPT) by six criteria: interpretability, compliance readiness, trustworthiness, regulatory auditability, bias and fairness, and domain specificity. A proposed evaluation protocol is presented to assess the adaptability of the systems through an illustrative architectural capability assessment. The present assessment is theoretical rather than empirical and is intended to demonstrate the potential value and discriminative capability of the proposed methodology. Because no expert panel evaluation or empirical dataset has yet been established, the illustrative values should not be interpreted as measured performance scores. Whereas purpose-built systems are more architecturally flexible, domain tuned GenAI systems are less flexible. We propose a prototype of how this work could be implemented in the real world. This encompasses a Banking Compliance Evaluation Suite, scoring protocol devised by a panel of experts, and a statistical
Anamika Singh· Iconic research and engineer...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.