This second ISPOR PerfO Task Force report focuses on clinical trial implementation considerations that are especially relevant to PerfO assessments, when compared to other clinical outcome assessment types.
Abstract
Performance outcome (PerfO) assessments are standardized, task-based clinical outcome assessments (COAs) used to evaluate patients' physical, cognitive, sensory, and functional abilities in clinical trials. Building on the first ISPOR PerfO Task Force report, which addressed selection, development, and modification of PerfO instruments, this second task force report focuses on clinical trial implementation considerations that are especially relevant to PerfO assessments, when compared to other clinical outcome assessment types. Examples of PerfO Assessments related to specific aspects of function (sensory, motor, cognitive, daily, ambulatory, and neurodevelopmental) are presented. Practical considerations related to clinical trial design, standardized documentation, administrator training, data collection and use of digital health technologies to enable reliable data collection are provided. Factors that jeopardize validity (including disease progression, learning effects, encouragement effects, and sensory or cognitive limitations) are identified alongside targeted mitigation strategies. As no analytic technique can compensate for inconsistent PerfO assessment implementation, careful planning and consistent monitoring of data collection is foundational to ensuring data are valid and interpretable.
A structured, standards-aligned development pathway can strengthen the trustworthiness of scores and the clinical utility of instruments used in high-acuity care, supporting well-evidenced decisions across research and practice.
Michael J. Ireland, S. A. Weerasinghe, Rohan De Pallant et al.· Australian Critical Care· 0 citations
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the 12 performance criteria from the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0 (PT CPI 3.0) on predicting Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) student clinical performance outcomes during clinical education...
Derrick F. Campbell, Nancy G. Hellman, Felicity Macahilig-Rice et al.· The Internet Journal of Alli...· 0 citations
Systematically using outcome measures (i.e., standardized assessments) in practice can guide clinical decision-making and demonstrate professional value. This project aimed to execute pre-implementation activities in preparation for integrating a systematic outcome measurement process in outpatient neurological occupat...
B. Stern, Stephen J. Hunter, Kate I. Minick et al.· OTJR: Occupation, Participat...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects motor, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning that impairment-based scales do not fully capture. This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties and applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in a...
Amelia Rizzo, M. G. Maggio, Andrea Calderone et al.· Medical Science· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Introduction: Psychometric properties of clinical measurement instruments are crucial because they indicate the quality, reliability, and validity of data collected in clinical settings as well as how accurately and consistently a tool measures change. The aim was to systematically review and report the measur...
P. B. Pfister, A. Bärlocher, A. Sole et al.· Archives of Physiotherapy· 0 citations
Abstract Background It can be challenging to identify clinically meaningful, responsive primary outcomes for psychosocial intervention trials in people with dementia. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), a personalised, patient-generated outcome measure, enables individuals to define and evaluate progress toward meaningful g...
J. Budgett, H. Demnitz-King, A. Sommerlad et al.· Age and Ageing· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.