Skip to content
Review

Recommendations on the Implementation of Performance Outcome Assessments in Clinical Trials: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.

Sep 2026 · Value in Health · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

This second ISPOR PerfO Task Force report focuses on clinical trial implementation considerations that are especially relevant to PerfO assessments, when compared to other clinical outcome assessment types.

Abstract

Performance outcome (PerfO) assessments are standardized, task-based clinical outcome assessments (COAs) used to evaluate patients' physical, cognitive, sensory, and functional abilities in clinical trials. Building on the first ISPOR PerfO Task Force report, which addressed selection, development, and modification of PerfO instruments, this second task force report focuses on clinical trial implementation considerations that are especially relevant to PerfO assessments, when compared to other clinical outcome assessment types. Examples of PerfO Assessments related to specific aspects of function (sensory, motor, cognitive, daily, ambulatory, and neurodevelopmental) are presented. Practical considerations related to clinical trial design, standardized documentation, administrator training, data collection and use of digital health technologies to enable reliable data collection are provided. Factors that jeopardize validity (including disease progression, learning effects, encouragement effects, and sensory or cognitive limitations) are identified alongside targeted mitigation strategies. As no analytic technique can compensate for inconsistent PerfO assessment implementation, careful planning and consistent monitoring of data collection is foundational to ensuring data are valid and interpretable.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Developing and evaluating measurement instruments for intensive and high-acuity care: A practical six-step guide aligned with international measurement standards.

A structured, standards-aligned development pathway can strengthen the trustworthiness of scores and the clinical utility of instruments used in high-acuity care, supporting well-evidenced decisions across research and practice.

Michael J. Ireland, S. A. Weerasinghe, Rohan De Pallant et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictors of Clinical Performance on the Revised Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the 12 performance criteria from the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0 (PT CPI 3.0) on predicting Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) student clinical performance outcomes during clinical education...

Derrick F. Campbell, Nancy G. Hellman, Felicity Macahilig-Rice et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Fostering the Systematic Use of Outcome Measures in Outpatient Neurological Occupational Therapy: Pre-Implementation Activities.

Systematically using outcome measures (i.e., standardized assessments) in practice can guide clinical decision-making and demonstrate professional value. This project aimed to execute pre-implementation activities in preparation for integrating a systematic outcome measurement process in outpatient neurological occupat...

B. Stern, Stephen J. Hunter, Kate I. Minick et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Measurement Properties and Applications of WHODAS 2.0 in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects motor, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning that impairment-based scales do not fully capture. This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties and applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in a...

Amelia Rizzo, M. G. Maggio, Andrea Calderone et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

A systematic review of psychometric properties of physical fitness and physical functioning outcome measures applied in adult people with hemophilia

ABSTRACT Introduction: Psychometric properties of clinical measurement instruments are crucial because they indicate the quality, reliability, and validity of data collected in clinical settings as well as how accurately and consistently a tool measures change. The aim was to systematically review and report the measur...

P. B. Pfister, A. Bärlocher, A. Sole et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Measuring what matters: evaluating the psychometric properties of goal attainment scaling in a psychosocial dementia trial

Abstract Background It can be challenging to identify clinically meaningful, responsive primary outcomes for psychosocial intervention trials in people with dementia. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), a personalised, patient-generated outcome measure, enables individuals to define and evaluate progress toward meaningful g...

J. Budgett, H. Demnitz-King, A. Sommerlad et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.