Skip to content
Open access

Prediction of Maximum Keratometry Progression With Stratified Progression Criteria in Keratoconus Patients Using Machine Learning

Aug 2026 · Translational Vision Science & Technology · Vol 15 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Machine learning–based prediction of Kmax progression may aid in scheduling risk-adapted follow-up appointments, potentially leading to more rapid identification of progression-suspect KC cases.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to use machine learning to predict 12-months progression of maximum keratometry (Kmax) within stratified repeatability limits based on a baseline topography/optical coherence tomography measurement in patients with keratoconus (KC). Methods This study included patients with diagnosed KC in which baseline and follow-up measurements were performed with a Placido disc topographer combined with optical coherence tomography (OCT) at a time interval of at least 7 months. Eyes were classified as “progressive” or “stable” based on the repeatability-adjusted difference in Kmax between the baseline measurement and a follow-up measurement. Nested cross-validation was used to train different algorithms, and the algorithm with the best area under the curve (AUC) value was used as final model. Results A total of 102 eyes of 65 patients were included. Mean age was 33.2 ± 13.0 years. Predictors with high outer fold stability included specific KC markers such as the CSIB index and posterior K values. Within the internal folds, the model achieved an AUC of 0.82, a sensitivity of 62.2%, and a specificity of 83.2% and, in the outer left-out folds, a sensitivity of 65.6%, a specificity of 84.3%, and thus an accuracy of 78.4%. Conclusions Progression of Kmax can be predicted with decent accuracy using a single OCT-based topographic measurement. Nested cross-validation represents a valuable tool in small datasets. Translational Relevance Machine learning–based prediction of Kmax progression may aid in scheduling risk-adapted follow-up appointments, potentially leading to more rapid identification of progression-suspect KC cases.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Influence of the Corneal Posterior-to-Anterior Radius Ratio on IOL Power Prediction Using Standard and Total Keratometry.

PURPOSE To compare the predictive accuracy of standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation across eyes stratified by the posterior-to-anterior corneal radius ratio (PAR). DESIGN Retrospective evaluation of IOL power calculation accuracy. METHODS A total of 1,314 eyes of 1,314 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with monofocal IOL implantation were enrolled. Preoperative biometry was performed with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Eyes were divided into three subgroups according to the PAR: low (<25th percentile), moderate (25th-75th percentiles), and high (>75th percentile). Refractive prediction errors (PEs) were calculated with the Barrett Universal II (BUII) and Kane formulas, using both K and TK values. Main outcome measures were PE, median absolute error (MedAE), and the proportions of eyes within predefined absolute prediction error thresholds. RESULTS PAR was independently associated with the discrepancy between K- and TK-based prediction errors in both the BUII and Kane formulas (both P<0.001). Compared with conventional K, TK produced a consistent myopic shift in eyes with low PAR (-0.10 D for both formulas; both P<0.001) and a hyperopic shift in eyes with high PAR (+0.14 D for both formulas; both P<0.001), whereas only minimal changes were observed in eyes with moderate PAR. Despite these systematic directional shifts, MedAE remained comparable between K- and TK-based calculations across all PAR subgroups. In the high PAR subgroup, incorporation of TK significantly reduced the proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of target refraction for the BUII formula (79.9% vs. 75.4%, P=0.041), whereas no significant difference was observed for the Kane formula. CONCLUSIONS PAR is an independent factor associated with the discrepancy between K- and TK-based refractive predictions. Rather than uniformly improving refractive accuracy, TK primarily induces systematic, PAR-dependent directional refractive shifts. These findings suggest that PAR may serve as a clinically useful biomarker for selecting between K- and TK-based calculations instead of supporting the routine use of TK in all eyes.

Zhongxi Yang, Fu-man Yang, Ziqi Meng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Prevalence of Abnormal Ectasia Screening Indices and the Predictive Value of Anterior Keratometry in Refractive Surgery Candidates.

Abnormal ectasia screening indices were common but predominantly borderline, and anterior keratometry alone could not reliably triage which corneas require tomographic examination, indicating that keratometry alone cannot replace it where it is not.

Kyo Youn Jeong, Gyuwon Ryu, Moonwon Hwang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Validation and extension of the SUCCESS score for Fuchs dystrophy after cataract surgery

Accurate preoperative identification of patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) who are at risk of requiring endothelial keratoplasty (EK) after cataract surgery remains challenging. The SUbClinical Corneal Edema Scheimpflug Study (SUCCESS) score was previously developed to estimate this risk using Scheimpflug tomography. We aimed to prospectively and externally validate the SUCCESS score in an independent multicenter cohort and determine whether the incorporation of corneal densitometry improves predictive performance and clinical utility. In this prospective multicenter cohort study, 207 eyes from 177 patients with FECD grade ≥ 2 and visually significant cataract were enrolled across six tertiary hospitals in Spain (June 2020 to October 2024), with follow-up through May 2025. After predefined exclusions, 178 eyes (149 patients) were analyzed. The original SUCCESS score was used without recalibration. An extended model incorporated peak mean corneal densitometry within the central 3-mm zone. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Discrimination, calibration, reclassification, and clinical utility were assessed using Harrell’s C-index, Brier score, net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis. Over a median follow-up of 37.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.1–45.9), 38 eyes (21%) met the criteria for EK, with 82% of events occurring within 6 months after phacoemulsification. The original SUCCESS score demonstrated good discrimination (C-index = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.86) with slight underestimation of absolute risk (predicted 16.4% vs. observed 21.6%). Incorporation of corneal densitometry improved discrimination (C-index = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79–0.90; ΔC = + 0.05; P = 0.0047), reduced prediction error (ΔBrier = − 0.019; P < 0.001), and enhanced risk reclassification (NRI = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14–0.64; P = 0.002), including correct upward reclassification of 26% of eyes requiring EK. The extended model provided greater net benefit at relevant decision thresholds (25%–50%). In this multicenter external validation study, the SUCCESS score demonstrated a robust performance in predicting postoperative EK in FECD. The addition of corneal densitometry provided incremental improvements in discrimination and clinically meaningful risk stratification, particularly in intermediate-risk cases. Standardized Scheimpflug-based risk assessment may support individualized surgical planning and referral decisions.

F. Arnalich-Montiel, Martha Stokking, N. Sáenz-Madrazo et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.