This work establishes an architecture-general hardness bound for this boundary for the standard local depolarizing noise of strength $\gamma$ for any circuit architecture satisfying the standard average-case #P-hardness conjecture for ideal RCS, and shows that noisy RCS on the same architecture remains hard to simulate classically within any inverse-polynomial total variation distance.
Abstract
Random circuit sampling (RCS) is a leading candidate for demonstrating quantum advantage, supported by strong complexity-theoretic evidence of hardness in the ideal setting and by rapid experimental progress to date. In practice, however, noise is unavoidable, and a central problem is to identify the noise-strength boundary between classically simulable and classically hard regimes. In this work, we establish an architecture-general hardness bound for this boundary for the standard local depolarizing noise of strength $\gamma$. Assuming the standard average-case #P-hardness conjecture for ideal RCS, we show that, for any circuit architecture satisfying this conjecture, noisy RCS on the same architecture remains hard to simulate classically within any inverse-polynomial total variation distance whenever $\gamma=O(\log n/(nd))$ for $n$-qubit circuits of depth $d$, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Crucially, noisy-RCS hardness follows without any additional conjectural or architecture-specific assumption beyond those already entering the ideal-RCS hardness framework. Our proof combines a low-degree polynomial extrapolation with a monotonicity reduction showing that efficient classical simulation at one depolarizing noise strength implies efficient simulation at every larger strength. Together, these ingredients transfer the standard ideal-RCS hardness conjecture to sampling hardness at a prespecified noise strength. Finally, combining the convergence-to-uniformity result of Dalzell et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 78 (2024)] with our monotonicity reduction yields efficient classical simulation for $\gamma=\omega(\log n/(nd))$ on layered, regularly connected architectures. Thus, wherever the two architectural settings overlap, this identifies $\gamma=\Theta(\log n/(nd))$ as the asymptotic complexity-transition scale.
Sampling-based proposals are prominent candidates for demonstrating quantum computations beyond the reach of classical supercomputers. However, it has been difficult to combine their complexity-theoretic hardness with two capabilities needed for scalable quantum computing more generally: suppressing hardware errors, and verifying the quantum computation itself. Here we address both issues by introducing structured circuits, which, in addition to provable hardness guarantees, admit an encoding in a quantum code. This allows us to simultaneously reach high fidelities at high circuit depths, and to certify an experimental fidelity via the circuit structure and measurement of code syndromes. The resulting certificate is device dependent, but requires substantially weaker noise assumptions than existing fidelity proxy benchmarks. We demonstrate our proposal with a $64$-qubit, depth-$73$ Clifford circuit, doped with $314$ $T$ gates. We use a total of $76$ physical qubits to encode this computation in spacetime codes, effectively suppressing gate error rates by $10\times$ after syndrome post-selection, and yielding a state with a fidelity lower bound of $0.349$ with $95\%$ confidence. Our construction is a systematic method for promoting a stabilizer state to a magic state while keeping an error-detected fidelity certificate.
S. Martiel, Jay-U. Chung, A. Seif et al.· 4 citations
We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]$ circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Unitary designs provide finite-moment approximations to Haar-random unitaries, with wide-ranging applications across physics and quantum information, from scrambling and black-hole dynamics to foundational primitives in quantum algorithms. Strong unitary designs capture a more demanding operational notion of approximation, requiring indistinguishability from Haar randomness even for quantum algorithms that may access a unitary not only in the forward direction, but also through its inverse, transpose, and complex conjugate. Motivated by the physical requirement that scrambling arise within the system itself, Schuster, Ma, Lombardi, Brand\~ao, and Huang (arXiv:2509.26310) left open whether strong unitary designs can be generated in logarithmic depth using only the system qubits. For every fixed design order $k$ and measurable-error tolerance, we construct strong approximate unitary $k$-designs in optimal $\Theta(\log n)$ all-to-all circuit depth using only the $n$ original system qubits. Our new ingredient is a logarithmic-depth Pauli-mixing bound for the perfect-matching ensemble, whose layers pair the qubits uniformly at random and apply independent random two-qubit gates. This bound controls the mixed forward-reverse two-query case, which we combine with existing design and gluing results to obtain strong unitary designs of arbitrary fixed order.
Teodor Parella-Dilmé, Júlia Barberà-Rodríguez, Salvatore F. E. Oliviero et al.· 1 citation
Quantum advantage is widely expected to require sufficiently deep circuits, where correlations and global computational structure can grow beyond the reach of efficient classical simulation. This expectation is especially stark for constant-depth circuits with local readout: the expectation value of any fixed local observable lies within a bounded backward lightcone and is therefore classically tractable. Here we show that measurement feedback changes this picture. We establish a strict hierarchy of computational power: at fixed coherent depth, increasing the number of feedback outcomes strictly enlarges the class of functions accessible through a local expectation value. The two ends of this hierarchy exhibit distinct computational regimes. With logarithmic feedback, local expectation values for product-state inputs are efficiently classically simulable. Polynomial feedback, by contrast, enables an explicit family of adaptive shallow circuits to encode prime-field discrete logarithm problem~(DLP) into a fixed single-qubit expectation. Assuming the standard worst-case classical hardness of DLP, estimating this expectation value is classically hard. These results reveal a feedback-driven complexity transition, with further implications for resource lower bounds on DLP and the complexity of local-observable estimation under area-law entanglement. Our results open a new route to quantum advantage with shallow quantum circuits.
Yusen Wu, Yukun Zhang, Xiao-Ming Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Random quantum objects are powerful resources for quantum information processing, yet exact Haar randomness is costly and typically unnecessary. We introduce an explicit sparse commuting circuit ensemble on $n$ qubits that reproduces low-order Haar moments in the stringent relative-error sense. The circuit consists of a sparse Clifford phase layer followed by independent single-qubit Clifford gates. Acting on a simple product state, the resulting ensemble forms $\epsilon$-approximate projective $2$- and $3$-designs in relative error, with the required logarithmic interaction degree being asymptotically optimal within this circuit family. It admits an ancilla-free implementation of quantum depth $O(\log(n/\epsilon))$ on an all-to-all architecture, as well as an adaptive constant-depth implementation---in fact, depth seven---using $O(n\log(n/\epsilon))$ ancilla qubits. Departing from existing shallow-design paradigms, our analysis exploits the intrinsic moment structure of commuting phase circuits; at third order, this requires a new block decomposition and combinatorial analysis that also suggests a route toward higher-order shallow designs. Our results show that precise Haar-like statistics can emerge from sparse commuting dynamics with remarkably low quantum resources, with applications to randomized characterization, quantum metrology, quantum algorithms, and many-body physics.
Qing-Yue Zhang, Jun-Jie Chen, Zhou You et al.· 0 citations
The threshold theorem states that quantum computations can be made reliable below a physical error threshold, at the cost of additional physical qubits and circuit depth. Recent work has reduced these space and time overheads to polylogarithmic or nearly logarithmic scalings, but whether the cumulative spacetime overhead can be constant has remained unclear. Here, we show that even for the simplest task of preserving quantum information in a quantum memory, under an optimistic noise model and allowing general adaptive protocols, there is an unavoidable logarithmic contribution to the cumulative spacetime overhead. This additional cost can nevertheless be shared among many logical qubits, so sufficiently wide computations, including standard implementations of Shor's algorithm, may still achieve constant relative overhead. We further give a positive-rate CSS code construction that attains the memory bound, identify sufficient conditions under which the same scaling extends from quantum memory to fault-tolerant circuit implementations, and derive circuit-size bounds for subsystem spacetime codes. Our work establishes fundamental limits on the resources required for quantum fault tolerance.
Kishor Bharti, Tobias Haug, Andrew Tanggara· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
