Jun 2026· Informatica· Vol 50· 0 citations· 28 references
TL;DR
A dynamic Chain-of-Thought prompting method based on problem difficulty assessment that effectively resolve the two major limitations of traditional exemplar-based methods, enabling LLMs to obtain appropriately tailored exemplars for both multi-step mathematical reasoning and interdisciplinary question answering.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across multiple domains and emerged as the core driving force in natural language processing. Their reasoning however can be associated with logical flaws and lack of stability when attempting to solve difficult problems that require multi-step deduction, cross-domain knowledge or implicit constraints, with redundant or insufficient exemplars in conventional prompts and poor fit with exemplar and target problems. To address these issues, we propose a dynamic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting method based on problem difficulty assessment: first, the model performs zero-shot self-evaluation of the required solution steps to dynamically determine the number of exemplars; then, it integrates BM25 retrieval to select the most similar high-quality question-answer pairs, constructing precise Few-shot prompts. Experiments conducted on multiple datasets effectively resolve the two major limitations of traditional exemplar-based methods, enabling LLMs to obtain appropriately tailored exemplars for both multi-step mathematical reasoning and interdisciplinary question answering. Consequently, the accuracy of complex reasoning is improved to varying degrees across tasks.
A scale-aware comparative study of reasoning enhancement for SLMs across three major families of methods: prompting-based reasoning, retrieval-based augmentation, and knowledge graph guided scaffolding shows that reasoning-enhancement strategies are not universally transferable across model scales under the evaluated s...
Zhen-Zhen Gu, Jie Liu, Xian Liu· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to extract relations among multiple entities across extended contexts while maintaining consistency across predicted triples. Although large language models (LLMs) show remarkable reasoning capabilities in information extraction, their predictions are typically generated...
Overall, AutoCoC contributes a reproducible and scalable alternative to expert-authored concept hierarchies by automatically deriving domain-specific prompt structures from documentation, making concept-based prompting more practical for structured knowledge generation.
Hurile Borjigin, Nishtha N. Vaidya, Thomas A. Runkler et al.· SKILLED-LLMs@FLoC· 0 citations
This work proposes Multi-model Relevance-Guided Reverse Reasoning (MRGRR), which uses a target model and auxiliary models to generate reverse reasoning prompt candidates and shows higher average accuracy than six CoT baselines.
Bo-Ao Hu, Yingxun Fu, Li Ma· Journal of Supercomputing· 0 citations
I Reasoning via Multi-Teacher Distillation is proposed, a novel framework that 'compiles' the reasoning abilities of large teacher LLMs into a lightweight student Small Language Model (SLM), which significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both recommendation accuracy and inference efficiency.