Skip to content
Open access

A Framework for the Estimation of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Using Joint Models of Longitudinal and Survival Data

Aug 2026 · Medical decision making · Vol 46, pp. 874 - 886 · 0 citations · 55 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A new methodology for estimating QALYs within a unified, flexible and extensible framework is developed that can improve QALY estimation and their use in cost-effectiveness analyses in practice, enabling more timely and robust health technology assessments.

Abstract

Background: Length and quality of life are frequently combined in health technology assessments to derive a single, generic measure of health improvement due to a treatment or medicine. One such measure is given by quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), typically calculated assuming discrete health states and quality-of-life values. The accurate estimation of QALYs is crucial for informed decision making in health care policy and resource allocation; however, traditional methods often rely on assumptions that are sometimes biologically and statistically inappropriate. This study aims to develop a framework for estimating QALYs in populations where survival data are collected that addresses these limitations. Methods: A framework for estimating QALYs in continuous time is introduced, based on joint longitudinal-survival models fitted using maximum likelihood; the proposed framework requires patient-level data, including longitudinal health utility values and overall survival. In contrast to the conventional approach, which involves dichotomising health states and separate models, this method allows the estimation of QALYs from a single model while accounting for all the statistical and biological intricacies of the data, providing a more appropriate estimate for cost-effectiveness modeling. The joint modeling approach is validated using Monte Carlo simulation under realistic data-generating mechanisms. Results: Simulations showed that the joint longitudinal-survival modeling approach could recover the true QALYs without bias. Conversely, a comparison method based on calculating QALYs directly from the health utility trajectories, ignoring the survival process, was biased under most scenarios. Conclusions: A new methodology for estimating QALYs within a unified, flexible and extensible framework has been developed. This approach can improve QALY estimation and their use in cost-effectiveness analyses in practice, enabling more timely and robust health technology assessments. User-friendly Stata software is provided.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Adjusting Survival Curves to Incorporate External Evidence: A Simplified Approach without Patient-Level Data

Introduction: Cost-effectiveness modeling often requires the extrapolation of survival data from clinical trials. The choice of extrapolation method is often uncertain and can have a profound effect on the results. We propose an approach that incorporates external evidence (eg, from published studies, registries, or el...

David McConnell, Arthur White, F. Lamrock et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Assessment of Model Life Table Methods for Estimating Life Expectancy at Birth in India

Model life tables provide an effective approach for estimating age-specific mortality patterns when only summary mortality indicators are available. This study used data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4: 2015-16; NFHS-5: 2019-21) and the Sample Registration System (SRS: 2015 and 2020) to estimate life exp...

P. Yadav, Guru Vasishtha · 0 citations
Sep 2026

A joint model for individual mean and within-subject variability of a longitudinal outcome with competing-risk time-to-event outcomes

Motivated by a growing body of research emphasizing the importance of modeling within-subject (WS) variability in longitudinal biomarkers and its association with health outcomes, this paper proposes a semiparametric joint model for both the mean and WS variability of a longitudinal biomarker, jointly with competing-ri...

Shan-Peng Li, D. Nuyujukian, R. McClelland et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Marker or mechanism? Medical imaging utilisation and population life expectancy in 38 OECD countries, 2000 to 2024 year.

Background. Medical imaging is central to modern diagnosis and treatment, yet its contribution to population level survival has rarely been quantified, and the few existing estimates have been interpreted as evidence that imaging directly extends life. Whether national imaging utilisation reflects a distinct clinical m...

R. Obuchowicz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.