Oct 2026· Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering· 0 citations· 25 references
Medicine
TL;DR
An Anatomy-Preserving Contrastive Unpaired Translation framework with a CT-source Sobel edge-consistency term for CT → US translation is evaluated, finding that it improves one relative structural proxy over CUT, but absolute structural scores remained low.
Abstract
Abstract Objectives When ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are both clinically indicated, unpaired image translation may support model development but cannot replace either examination. We evaluated Anatomy-Preserving Contrastive Unpaired Translation (AP-CUT), a CUT-based framework with a CT-source Sobel edge-consistency term for CT → US translation. Methods The study used 832 malignant thyroid US images from TN5000 and 800 cervical CT slices from Head-Neck-CHUM. CycleGAN, CUT, and AP-CUT were compared with a low-dimensional Fréchet proxy and nearest-neighbor SSIM/PSNR. Bounding boxes were used only to prepare local US regions for qualitative US → CT examples. A separate single-run experiment treated 600 CT → US outputs as malignant-class training examples and evaluated three classifiers. Results AP-CUT had the highest CT → US nearest-neighbor SSIM (0.1388), compared with 0.0982 for CUT and 0.1247 for CycleGAN. CycleGAN had the lowest US → CT proxy FID (10.4; lower is better). In the classification experiment, the absolute AUC change was +0.0002 for ResNet-50, +0.0261 for EfficientNet-B4 (0.7297 to 0.7558), and −0.0109 for EfficientNet-B4 + CBAM. Conclusions The CT-source regularizer improved one relative structural proxy over CUT, but absolute structural scores remained low. US → CT outputs are local CT-domain-styled patches rather than reconstructed axial CT images, and the mixed single-run classification results do not establish clinical utility.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.