Skip to content

Uncertainty as risk: A plug-and-play evidence-guided framework with error-aligned calibration for medical image segmentation.

Aug 2026 · Medical Image Analysis · Vol 114, pp. 104291 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The results demonstrate that the proposed "plug-and-play" evidence-guided framework for reliable medical image segmentation generally achieves a more consistent, spatially coherent uncertainty representation that better aligns with the true error, providing a practical tool for quality control and risk awareness in clinical deployment.

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. However, in complex scenarios, factors such as boundary ambiguity, annotation noise, and domain shift often lead models to be overconfident, limiting the interpretability and trustworthy deployability. To address this, we propose a "plug-and-play" evidence-guided framework for reliable medical image segmentation. By incorporating an evidential constraint to suppress "high-confidence but erroneous" predictions, and without altering the existing segmentation backbone architecture, we append a lightweight evidential prediction head to enable the model to simultaneously output segmentation results and pixel-wise uncertainty in a single forward pass. An error-driven uncertainty calibration term is further introduced to enhance the joint calibration of evidence strength and scale, improving the stability, interpretability, and consistency of the risk indicator with the true error. Moreover, to reduce the reliance on manual empirical thresholds when utilizing uncertainty, we design an adaptive threshold selection process based on a validation set. During deployment, this enables the output of a reference-free high-risk region prompt for quality control, and, when annotations are available, facilitates quantitative validation through geometric consistency metrics between the uncertain region and the actual error region. We systematically evaluate our framework on a representative backbone, U-Net, across multiple datasets, and further investigate its architectural applicability through cross-backbone experiments. The results demonstrate that, with negligible increase in inference cost, our method generally achieves a more consistent, spatially coherent uncertainty representation that better aligns with the true error, providing a practical tool for quality control and risk awareness in clinical deployment. The source code is available at: https://github.com/Xingchao003/EviRisk-Seg.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

A comprehensive survey of UQ techniques in medical image segmentation is presented, categorizing existing approaches into Bayesian methods, deep ensembles, deterministic methods, test-time data augmentation, and hybrid models, while treating foundation-model-based UQ as a separate cross-cutting category.

Seyed Sina Ziaee, K. Ovens · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation via Perturbation-Aware Mutual Learning and Edge-Aware Uncertainty Loss for Accurate Anatomical Delineation.

This paper proposes a novel framework that effectively leverages unlabeled data to improve segmentation performance in cardiac structures and applies a novel consistency constraint by a dual fine-grained boundary loss that provide global characteristics-based guidance from the transition of the boundary region and an edge-aware uncertainty loss.

Waqas Anwaar, Van Manh, Wufeng Xue et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Exploring the Connection between Uncertainty and Tissue Boundaries in Medical Image Segmentation.

An Evidential Uncertainty-Guided Boundary (EUGB) loss is proposed to demonstrate that uncertainty information can indeed facilitate combating boundary segmentation errors, and empirical insights for selecting appropriate loss functions across different application scenarios are provided.

Na Zeng, Qiao Lin, Xingyue Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Boundary Noise: Aggregated Aleatoric Uncertainty Fails to Capture Presence Ambiguity in 3D Lung Nodule Segmentation

These findings expose a fundamental mismatch between the theoretical promise of aleatoric uncertainty and its practical behavior, and suggest that practitioners should not rely on entropy-based uncertainty as a proxy for clinical ambiguity in safety-critical applications.

Simon Baur, Arne Schernich, Ekin Böke et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

CARD: Calibration via Agreement in Reverse Diffusion for Out-of-Domain MRI Segmentation

Probability calibration aligns model confidence with predictive accuracy, enabling clinicians to identify unreliable segmentation regions. This alignment breaks down under domain shift, where artifacts and unseen protocols produce confident errors. Existing post-hoc methods adapt the correction at test time, conditioning on predictive entropy, the logit pattern, or augmentation response, but each proxy is read from the terminal prediction, the very quantity that shift corrupts. This motivates reliability evidence beyond the terminal prediction, which categorical diffusion provides in two ways. First, a generative shape prior keeps a capacity-limited reference intact when appearance is corrupted, so its disagreement with the primary segmentor highlights primary-model errors. Second, every reverse step yields a class distribution, separating persistent disagreement from transient discrepancy. Aggregated over the trajectory, this disagreement correlates with Dice at 0.788, against 0.521 for a matched discriminative control. We therefore propose CARD (Calibration via Agreement in Reverse Diffusion), which maps the temporal aggregate of this disagreement to a temperature field applied per pixel across all classes, so that confidence changes while the segmentation does not. Across cardiac, prostate and brain MRI shifts, CARD lowers calibration error in 45 of 49 comparisons against the strongest baseline in each setting.

Jiateng Dai, Wei Guo, Qing-Biao Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.