Skip to content
Open access

Cross-Sectional Return Prediction in China’s A-Share Market Based on Lasso and XGBoost: A Comparison with the Fama–MacBeth Multi-Factor Model

Sep 2026 · Financial Economics Research · Vol 3, pp. 84-96 · 0 citations · 12 references

TL;DR

The intrinsic mechanism of multi-indicator deviation is explained, the applicable boundaries of factor dimensionality of different models are defined, and a reference for target lightweight modeling for small and medium-sized institutions is provided.

Abstract

In response to the problem of the widespread use of mixed prediction performance metrics in machine learning stock selection literature, the lack of empirical tests on the applicability boundaries of linear and tree-based models under low-dimensional factor settings, and the disconnection of most high-dimensional factor empirical conclusions from the actual scenarios of small and medium-sized quantitative institutions, this paper selects the monthly panel data of A-shares from 2013 to 2023 to avoid the leakage of look-ahead information, and builds a unified rolling-window forecasting framework of FM, Lasso-FM, and XGBoost. The model hyperparameters are selected based on the existing literature to ensure a fair comparison among the three models. It relies on OOS-R², IC, Rank-IC and long-short portfolio Sharpe ratio to carry out multi-dimensional evaluation, and carries out analysis in combination with the heterogeneity of market value grouping and SHAP decomposition. In addition, multiple sets of robustness checks are conducted. The empirical evidence shows that under the sample setting of the five basic factors in this article, the mean out-of-sample OOS- R² values of all three models are negative, the absolute return prediction performance is weak, and there is no significant statistical superiority or inferiority between the models; However, there is a deviation in the evaluation index, and XGBoost performs better in cross-sectional stock ranking and long–short portfolio performance, which is rooted in the fact that OOS-R² focuses on absolute error, and IC only focuses on the relative return strength of stocks; Based on the observation of this sample, it is difficult for XGBoost to release nonlinear modeling capability, and greater model flexibility has the possibility of inducing out-of-sample overfitting. The forecast stability of large-cap stocks is significantly higher than that of small-cap stocks, and the market value and ROA are important prediction features of the model. This paper explains the intrinsic mechanism of multi-indicator deviation, defines the applicable boundaries of factor dimensionality of different models, and provides a reference for target lightweight modeling for small and medium-sized institutions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Out-of-Sample Evaluation of Machine Learning for Macro-Factor-Based ETF Allocation

The research shows that the allocation value of low-frequency macro and market characteristics is limited, and strict out-of-sample testing and asset exposure control help to identify the applicable boundaries of machine learning strategies.

Jing Liu · 0 citations
Conference Sep 2026

LSTM-Based Portfolio Optimization Across Multi-Market Equity Universes: A Comparative Study of LQ45, DJIA, SSE50, and a Global Portfolio

This study integrates long short-term memory (LSTM) return forecasting with mean-variance optimization across Indonesia’s LQ45, the U.S. DJIA, and China’s SSE50 under a leakage-aware protocol (Jan–Feb 2026, 32 trading days). Forecast-free Minimum Variance proves more robust than LSTM-driven Maximum Sharpe, attaining th...

Nicholas Reynard Kusuma, Aaron Ng, Kie Van Ivanky Saputra · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Predicting CSI 800 Sector Index Returns in China ——A Multifactor Statistical and Regularized Learning Approach

Industry allocation is critical to asset allocation and a major source of excess returns in active investing. This study explores sector return predictability in China with a multifactor framework. We employ monthly data spanning January 2019 to June 2026 for 11 CSI 800 primary sector indices and build 11 predictors, i...

Cai-Yue Zhao · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Stock Asset Pricing Based on the Integration of Multifactor Models and Machine Learning

This study examines whether combining traditional multifactor asset-pricing theory with machine-learning methods can improve the explanation and prediction of U.S. stock returns. The sample comprises ten large U.S.-listed firms across six sectors, with SPY as the market proxy. Monthly returns cover August 2023 through...

Si-Han Qin · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Repricing China: A 25-Year Replication of the Liu–Stambaugh–Yuan Three-Factor Model

The China-specific three-factor model has dominated the explanation of cross-sectional stock returns in the Chinese A-share market since the work of Liu et al. However, their evidence is limited to the sample period of 1995–2014, while the Chinese equity market has undergone substantial changes. Whether the original si...

Zi-Yang Wang · 0 citations

To boost or not to boost? XGBoost and DCC-GARCH integration for mean-variance portfolio optimization

This study examines whether integrating machine learning-based return forecasting and dynamic covariance estimation into a mean-variance portfolio framework produces measurable improvements over a conventional benchmark. Three strategies are constructed and evaluated over a five-year out-of-sample window from January 2...

Gun Assavasopee · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.