The exponential, pervasive rise of artificial intelligence (AI), hosted in large data centres, will test the limits of the underpinning infrastructure, including electricity and water supplies, which are becoming increasingly precious resources. Rather than performing all AI computations in centralized servers, for many functionalities, these can be performed locally across a network of billions of small, autonomous nodes, saving substantial energy costs associated with communication. This alternative paradigm is known as edge computing, or distributed intelligence (DI), but has been held back by the lack of availability of reliable local energy supplies matching the energy requirements of the computational infrastructure. Opportunities to address this challenge are emerging with rapid advances in high-performance indoor photovoltaics (IPVs) for local energy harvesting, as well as reductions in computational cost through neuromorphic or in-memory computing devices. In this perspective, we discuss the requirements of IPVs for DI, the extent to which emerging materials fulfil these requirements, and how current gaps could be addressed. We make the case that (anti)ferroelectric materials can surpass bottlenecks for both electrostatic energy storage and low-power in-memory neuromorphic computing. The core theme of this perspective is that co-creation between energy harvesting, storage and computing is essential for making DI a reliable and more sustainable alternative to centralized AI.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.