Skip to content
#edge computing Preprint

Fast Bayesian Updating of the Neutron-Star Equation of State with Neural Posterior and Evidence Estimation

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 56 references
Physics

TL;DR

A Green-function Evidence Network (EN), a regression-based variant of Evidence Networks and, to the authors' knowledge, the first Evidence Network applied to neutron-star EOS inference, is introduced.

Abstract

We present two complementary neural routes for microscopic neutron-star EOS inference: truncated sequential neural posterior estimation with mixture importance sampling (TSNPE+MIS), which targets one observation, and amortized neural posterior estimation with importance sampling (A-NET+IS), which is reused across nuclear inputs and NICER sources. Both are corrected against the original prior and full likelihood, with the effective sample size as a diagnostic. We test nucleonic and hyperonic relativistic mean-field models with nuclear data, NICER, GW170817, and pQCD. For the fiducial analyses, both agree with UltraNest in the parameter posteriors and 90% mass-radius and tidal-deformability bands. TSNPE+MIS band-edge differences are only 0.024-0.033 km and 1.02-1.03%, while A-NET+IS differences are 0.019-0.050 km and 0.86-1.13%. TSNPE+MIS reduces the computing time by factors of 1.6-2.3; after training, A-NET+IS is 15-240 times faster per configuration. The frozen A-NET also analyzes three NICER sources absent from training, including the newly reported high-mass, compact PSR J1614-2230 posterior. For this source, the inferred $R_{1.4}$ agrees with UltraNest within 0.010 km for nucleonic matter and 0.009 km for hyperonic matter. We also introduce a Green-function Evidence Network (EN), a regression-based variant of Evidence Networks and, to our knowledge, the first Evidence Network applied to neutron-star EOS inference. After a one-time cost, its network queries return absolute evidences in about 0.03 s for new nuclear data and 3.5 s for a new NICER source; all 16 differences from UltraNest are below $1\sigma$, and independent importance-sampling evidences agree within the quoted EN uncertainties. Under the adopted likelihood, both evidence calculations favor nucleonic matter by Bayes factors of about 22:1-27:1.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.