The proposed MARC (Morphology-Aware Regression of Consensus), a framework that predicts a multi-method consensus-support map for SST segmentation, demonstrates that the predicted consensus maps localise weakly supported regions while preserving consensus-based rankings and identifying low-consensus cells for manual review.
Abstract
Accurate cell segmentation remains a major bottleneck in subcellular spatial transcriptomics (SST), in which morphological images and spatially resolved RNA transcripts are used to partition tissues into individual cellular instances. As segmentation serves as the foundation for constructing cell-level representations, boundary errors can lead to incorrect transcript assignments and compromise downstream analyses. However, reliable ground-truth boundaries are unavailable because they must be inferred from incomplete morphological and transcript signals. Furthermore, manual annotation of a large number of cells is time-consuming. Agreement among complementary segmentation methods provides a practical surrogate for identifying well-supported and ambiguous regions, but explicit consensus construction requires executing multiple computationally intensive pipelines. In this study, we propose MARC (Morphology-Aware Regression of Consensus), a framework that predicts a multi-method consensus-support map for SST segmentation. MARC is trained with leave-one-method-out consensus pseudo-targets and a Foreground-Union Consensus Loss that focuses supervision on candidate and consensus foreground. We evaluated MARC on 4,642 held-out tiles from Xenium kidney tissue, achieving a mean Dice score of 0.90, a mean intersection-over-union of 0.82, and a mean cell-level Spearman correlation of 0.79 against explicitly computed cross-method consensus maps. We demonstrate that the predicted consensus maps localise weakly supported regions while preserving consensus-based rankings and identifying low-consensus cells for manual review. These results show that MARC closely approximates explicit cross-method consensus without multi-method inference and therefore has the potential to facilitate robust, consensus-aware evaluation of cell segmentation in large-scale SST studies.
Abstract Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables measurement of gene expression while preserving spatial organization within tissues. Accurate reconstruction of single-cell transcriptomes requires precise whole-cell segmentation, yet many ST experiments provide only nuclear staining images, making reliable inference of ce...
In spatial transcriptomics, cell segmentation is used to draw boundaries around cells. Molecules located within a cell’s boundary are assigned to it, making its gene expression profile dependent on segmentation accuracy. To identify potentially problematic cells, studies increasingly use doublet detection methods, a cl...
Technologies for estimating RNA expression at high throughput, in intact tissue slices and with high spatial resolution (spatial transcriptomics) shed new light on how cells communicate and tissues function. A fundamental step in analyzing data generated by subcellular resolution spatial transcriptomics technologies is...
Predicting gene expression from H&E-stained histology images offers a scalable alternative to costly spatial transcriptomics, yet most existing methods operate at the spot level, where signals from multiple cells are aggregated and critical cellular heterogeneity is obscured. Extending this paradigm to single-cell reso...
Zi-Jun Gao, Chun-Bin Gu, Jin-Xi Xiang et al.· 0 citations
Cell-level analysis of high-resolution spatial transcriptomics depends on accurate segmentation and transcript assignment, yet current workflows often trade transcript capture for boundary purity and can require substantial image-analysis expertise. We developed MCseg, a downloadable no-code platform whose fixed segmen...
C. Chan, Nai-Wen Chang, Chia-Yi Wang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.