Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

A lightweight pose-guided fusion approach for accurate safety helmet compliance monitoring on edge devices

Oct 2026 · Scientific Reports · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 33 references
Advanced Neural Network Applications

Abstract

This paper presents an AI framework employing automated visual analysis to verify personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance in complex construction and industrial settings. Within the framework of engineering automation, robust semantic modeling of worker safety configurations is essential for enabling real-time hazard monitoring and data-driven risk management. In such environments, lightweight architectures are crucial for low-latency inference and efficient deployment on resource-constrained edge computing devices. However, existing studies rely on standalone object detection, leading to unreliable PPE verification, or use computationally heavy models that limit real-time performance. The proposed framework performs helmet detection and human pose estimation within a unified YOLO11-based architecture using a shared backbone. A spatial consistency mechanism aligns head keypoints with helmet regions to verify correct PPE usage. Experimental results on the Construction Personal Protective Equipment (CPPE) dataset achieve an F1-score of 0.961 at 110.7 frames per second (FPS), maintaining both accuracy and efficiency. Further, the framework achieves up to a 67% reduction in false compliance alarms over standalone YOLO detectors and improved inference efficiency compared with previous multi-stage pipelines while reducing NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin energy per frame, with practical deployment demonstrated through an integrated web platform supporting live multi-stream monitoring and automated violation reporting. Performance evaluations on edge devices highlight the framework’s potential for scalable safety deployment and its contribution to improving real-time compliance systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.