Skip to content

Algorithmic Bias in AI Marketing: Implications for Consumer Equity and Brand Reputation

Oct 2026 · International Business & Economics Studies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in targeting, personalization, pricing, recommendation, and content-generation systems, intensifying concerns about algorithmic bias and its consequences for consumers and brands. This critical literature review synthesizes peer-reviewed and applied research published primarily between 2017 and 2025 to examine how bias enters AI-enabled marketing through data, model design, optimization objectives, and deployment contexts. The synthesis identifies three recurring mechanisms data, model, and contextual bias and shows how they can produce representational, measurement, and evaluation disparities. Across the reviewed literature, these disparities are associated with discriminatory targeting, exclusion, opaque personalization, perceived unfairness, and erosion of consumer trust, with downstream risks for brand legitimacy and reputation. The review further integrates technical, organizational, and regulatory mitigation approaches, including data audits, fairness-aware modeling, explainable AI, human oversight, governance structures, impact assessment, and regulatory compliance. The article contributes an integrated socio-technical perspective that connects the AI lifecycle to consumer-equity outcomes and reputational consequences. It concludes that responsible AI marketing requires fairness and accountability to be treated as design and governance objectives rather than post-hoc corrections.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.