Skip to content
Preprint

I-SDPO: Instance-Level Adaptive Self-Distillation Policy Optimization

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

I-SDPO (Instance-Level Adaptive Self-Distillation Policy Optimization), which treats teacher reliance as capability-dependent and uses imitation only where group-relative rewards are uninformative, obtains the best result in all four scientific domains.

Abstract

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) learns from reward differences within a rollout group, but receives no useful relative signal when every sampled response is incorrect. Privileged self-distillation can fill this gap with dense token supervision, yet applying it throughout training creates a different failure mode: the teacher is a biased, low-variance surrogate for the reward objective, so persistent imitation can oppose reward-improving updates after the policy becomes capable of producing successful trajectories. We introduce I-SDPO (Instance-Level Adaptive Self-Distillation Policy Optimization), which treats teacher reliance as capability-dependent. I-SDPO makes one routing decision per input instance and shares it across that instance's rollout group: all-incorrect groups use a privileged self-distillation objective, whereas any-success groups remain intact for GRPO. This design uses imitation only where group-relative rewards are uninformative. A local analysis characterizes when teacher and reward directions align and shows that a non-vanishing biased distillation weight induces an optimization bias floor. The routing rule automatically reduces the expected distillation rate as success probability rises, withdrawing teacher influence without a hand-designed schedule. On SciKnowEval, I-SDPO obtains the best result in all four scientific domains and improves average mean@16 accuracy from 56.67% with GRPO to 70.31%, with a maximum domain gain of 18.24 points.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

SR-OPSD: Self-Referenced On-Policy Self-Distillation

Extensive experiments across scientific evaluation, mathematical reasoning, and coding generation tasks with multiple large language models show that SR-OPSD achieves the state-of-the-art or competitive performance across various settings.

Zhuo Sun, Entong Li, Yan-Long Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

RRPO: Reference-Relative Policy Optimization with Stratified Conditional Rollouts

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown strong effectiveness in reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback, where sampled rollouts can be compared within a group using task-provided correctness signals. However, extending group-relative optimization beyond verifiable settings is challenging because success in many tasks is not captured by a single correctness criterion. We propose \textbf{Reference-Relative Policy Optimization (RRPO)}, which generalizes GRPO by replacing direct correctness-based advantage construction with reference-relative contrastive comparisons. RRPO first uses \emph{stratified conditional rollouts} to construct positive and negative anchor sets, and then trains a metric projection head with a set-contrastive objective to compare candidate rollouts against these anchors. The resulting alignment scores directly define contrastive advantages: during policy optimization, the projection head is frozen, and the scores are centered within each rollout group in a standard group-relative objective. We evaluate RRPO using anchor-based contrastive advantages throughout policy optimization, without relying on task ground-truth verifiers. Across verifiable reasoning, open-ended generation, and post-SFT settings, RRPO remains competitive with verifier-based optimization, improves over weakly supervised baselines, and provides additional gains after supervised fine-tuning.

Yuxin Xiong, Xun-Yi Jiang, Rohan Surana et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Group-Reflective Self-Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Group-Reflective Self-Distillation (GRSD), which derives capability-aligned and outcome-discriminative guidance from the policy's own verified rollouts, and refines turn-level credit assignment by modulating outcome-based advantages while preserving the verifier-determined learning direction.

Binbin Zheng, Zi-Jun Xie, Guan-Qun Zhao et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

Progress-conditioned Group Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks

Progress-conditioned Group Policy Optimization is proposed, which uses first-visit observation coverage only when all samples in a group receive zero outcome reward, and consistently improves over group-based baselines, with particularly large gains on hard tasks.

Kaibing Yang, Guangfeng Cai, Sheng-Tian Yang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

REOPD: Reliability-Adaptive Reward Extrapolation for On-Policy Distillation

REOPD combines a token-level compatibility weight with a batch-level adaptive budget, yielding a token-wise coefficient $\lambda_{b,t}=1+\gamma_b q_t$ that preserves teacher alignment while selectively extrapolating along reliable teacher-reference directions, demonstrating effective fine-grained reliability adaptation across domains and teacher configurations.

Yang Sun, Lichao Ma, Houyuan Qin et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

H2SD: Hybrid Hindsight Self-Distillation

Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks show that H$^2$SD achieves the strongest overall performance among representative RLVR and self-distillation baselines, with stable optimization and a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

Qi Cai, Yi-Chuan Ma, Linyang Li et al. · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.